What Is The Story Behind Panda Eyes?

Revallati panda eyes

The "panda eyes" theory is a popular idea on the internet that suggests that dark spots around the eyes, similar to dark circles or bruises, indicate that a person has suffered abuse, violence or, in some more conspiratorial contexts, that the person has undergone some kind of ritual or traumatic procedure.

The exact origin of this theory is unclear, but it has spread through social networks and conspiracy forums, especially in communities that discuss theories about manipulation and psychological or ritualistic abuse.

How does it happen?

"Panda eyes" occurs when a victim is sodomized by some "monster". This is done so violently - on purpose - that the blood vessels around the eyes rupture due to the physical displacement of pressure.

What does "panda eyes" mean?

It is pedophile slang for child sodomy. When a child is forcibly sodomized, their eyes can turn into dark circles due to the trauma involved, making them look like those of a panda. There is even an online clothing store selling “Panda Eyes” for the pedophile community...

Many pedophiles also joke about this online when talking about children. There are many symbols and codes that they use to inform other pedophiles about their perversions.

Conclusion: “Panda eyes” are, according to conspiracy theorists, a clear sign that a person may have experienced extreme psychological and physical abuse, often associated with secret rituals and mental manipulation. These dark circles around the eyes, according to this view, are not just ordinary dark circles, but marks of intense trauma. In certain elites, these rituals are used for psychological control and submission, a way of exploiting the person emotionally and physically to “program” them according to hidden interests. Although controversial, this theory sees in the "panda eyes" visual evidence of evils practiced in the shadows.

[content contributor: Revellati Online]

Jill Biden in a panda suit

Joe and Jill Biden on Halloween Day, 2024. Jill is wearing a panda costume. Why would she choose this particular costume, considering the "panda eyes" theory is well known, and the Biden family has been accused of incest and pedophilia? Is Jill Biden ignorant, or is she mocking us?

Look For The Truth Beneath The Layers Of Deception.

Revellati truth and deception

The deceptive art of directing public attention to one thing by focusing on an illusion.

Yet another AGENDA goes unnoticed. It is a deliberate strategy used to influence, manipulate and control public perception and behavior.

These operations create narratives that shape our understanding of reality, often obscuring the truth for other hidden agendas.

Truth becomes a victim of this war of perception, leaving the masses in a state of confusion and manipulation.

It is part of a “classic technique”, it is a reminder to question everything and look for the truth beneath the layers of deception.

In times of universal deception, the best weapon is to arm yourself with knowledge, question the narratives and dress your conscience with pride.

Stay alert, stay informed and never stop asking!

[content contributor: Revellati Online]

The Devil Sends Errors Into The World In Pairs.

two evils

"I feel a strong desire to tell you - and I expect you feel a strong desire to tell me - which of these two errors is the worse. That is the devil getting at us. He always sends errors into the world in pairs - pairs of opposites. And he always encourages us to spend a lot of time thinking which is the worse. You see why, of course? He relies on your extra dislike of one error to draw you gradually into the opposite one. But do not let us be fooled. We have to keep our eyes on the goal and go straight through between both errors. We have no other concern than that with either of them." (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity)

[image: Gismi via Pixabay]

Censorship Is Fast & Furious On Mastodon.

Mastodon censorship

Pictured above is a screenshot of the message I received from the power-mad moderators on Mastodon.social, one of the largest servers in the Mastodon social media network. Less than two days after I joined, I got my first strike against my account for merely reposting someone else's content. The original post stayed up, but my repost was taken down. The reason given? "Content violates the following community guidelines: Do not share information widely-known to be false and misleading." 

Here's the post:

Timo Malum post on Mastodon

The original post by Lesley Carhart said, "I am not sure that people outside the US who have not had to deal with a similar party leader understand when we say, 'cult', we mean an actual, completely brainwashed cult. Not just racists. Not just people who like strong men or fascism, as exists globally today. An actual cult, where the members are willing to abandon their families and long-time friends, give away their belongings, and even resort to violence. Nothing, no matter how vile or rational, will get through to them except careful deprogramming. We have to contend with that. It can happen to you. Please be careful out there."

At first I thought she had to be talking about the Marxist Democratic Party, since all the things she describes are what I see every day among the brainwashed leftists. But then I saw her hashtags, which all point to "blue" targets. It was then I realized she was talking about Republicans and probably anyone who supports Donald Trump. 

I could go point by point and destroy Carhart's post, but my concern isn't so much with her as it is with the moderators at Mastodon. Why was my repost considered a violation of community standards? Was it what Carhart said, or how I replied? My reply to the post said, "Members of a radical leftist cult think YOU'RE in a cult, and must be "deprogrammed". 

My reply was true, because that's clearly what Carhart said should happen to Republicans. Is pointing out the truth a violation of community standards, or is the act of criticizing a leftist my real violation? To be clear, Carhart's post originally appeared on Infosec.exchange, another Mastodon server, but was then made visible on Mastodon.social, where my account is. (If you're not familiar with the Mastodon "Fediverse", this probably seems confusing.) It's possible the original post met the standards on Infosec.exchange, but not Mastodon.social, and by reposting it and adding a comment, I brought it to the attention of the Mastodon.social moderators who might have been okay with my comment but not the original post. Unfortunately, I will never know. I appealed the strike, asking how the repost and comment were "widely-known to be false and misleading". Within a few minutes, I got a reply: Appeal Denied. I wasn't given the courtesy of an explanation.

I really wasn't surprised. The same thing happened to me on Twitter/X, only worse: a permanent suspension with no reason given, and no response to my appeal. This seems to be the standard operating procedure for social media sites now that the stench of authoritarianism has begun spreading around the world.

But what makes it so ironic is that the majority of the posts on Mastodon are from Democrats and other Marxists who constantly whine about the dangers of MAGA fascism. Can one of them explain how censorship from the left, often in cooperation with the government and big tech companies, is anything but fascism?

Worse than I've ever seen in my life, people are radically divided by their political ideologies. We all have more common ground than we realize, but the powerful people in the establishment and the media hacks they employ work day and night to drive wedges between us. In many cases, each side believes outright lies about the other, fueled by propaganda and other deliberate efforts to keep us fighting. It's a situation that works very well for the establishment.

Social media promised to bring us together and usher in a new era of communication and understanding. But if power-mad, intolerant moderators abuse their positions and censor things they disagree with, they end up doing harm to society even if they think they're doing something noble.

Mastodon.social has disappointed me in less than two days. They should do better. They HAVE to do better. They, and every other social media site, have a vital responsibility to the public.

They must begin to understand: there is no place for censorship in a free society. But we must begin to understand: many on the left don't want us to be free.

The Light Paper Issues 49 & 50 Are Now Available.

The Light Paper UK issue 49 cover

UK's only honest newspaper is now available for free download. Issue 49 has stories on infighting within the freedom movement, government & media manipulation, the dangers of smartphones, the dirt on clean energy, how to fight back against tyranny, and much more!

Download it here

The Light Paper UK issue 50 cover

Issue 50 has stories on the killer drug Midazolam, wasteful government spending, COVID censorship, the war on the elderly, the transgender pronoun debate, insane chicken registries, and of course, much more!

Download it here

Follow my blog with Bloglovin