They Won't Stop Spraying: Chemtrails Over North Carolina.

chemtrails over High Point NC on January 26, 2025

chemtrails over Archdale NC on January 26, 2025

chemtrails over Greensboro NC on January 26, 2025

The sky on January 26, 2025. Top: High Point, NC. Middle: Archdale, NC. Bottom: Greensboro, NC.

We're not allowed to have blue skies anymore. Almost every bright clear day brings out the chemtrail sprayers. The narrow streaks quickly spread out into wide bands, which then continue to spread until the entire sky is obscured by gray clouds. It's the same pattern every single time.

Watch the sky and see it for yourself. And then start asking questions.

Heavy Spraying Over North Carolina.

photograph of chemtrails in the North Carolina sky

The photograph above was taken in central North Carolina on Friday, December 13, 2024. I don't understand how anyone could look at this sky and think anything about it is natural. Two of the most prominent chemtrails form an 'X', something I've frequently seen over the past year. It's as if the pilots are trying to get our attention the only way they can. But still, most people are oblivious to it all. I guess if you're staring at your phone, you can't see what's happening above your head.

United Nations Agenda 2030 Is A Plan For Global Totalitarianism.

Revellati image United Nations Agenda 2030

Investigate United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.

"The most important factor working in the elite’s favor is the massive and widespread public disbelief in their schemes, because the scale is simply unimaginable for the average person to comprehend.

It is indeed hard to believe that a small group of people, disconnected from compassion, empathy, and the rest of humanity, would actively promote war, depopulation, and the destruction of the Earth. But the evidence shows that all of this exists, and is happening right before our eyes.

This is exactly the calculated response that those in power want to achieve: to hide the truth in plain sight, turning it into a joke or science fiction. (Conspiracy theory, disinformation)." 

[source: Revellati Online]

The United Nations’ Agenda 2030 (formerly known as Agenda 21), also known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), is a comprehensive plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity. Adopted by all UN member states in 2015, it sets out 17 interconnected goals to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure peace and prosperity for all.

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals:
1. No Poverty: End poverty in all its forms everywhere.
2. Zero Hunger: End hunger, achieve food security, and improve nutrition.
3. Good Health and Well-being: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.
4. Quality Education: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities.
5. Gender Equality: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.
6. Clean Water and Sanitation: Ensure access to water and sanitation for all.
7. Affordable and Clean Energy: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy.
8. Decent Work and Economic Growth: Promote sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.
9. Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation.
10. Reduced Inequalities: Reduce income and social inequalities within and among countries.
11. Sustainable Cities and Communities: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.
12. Responsible Consumption and Production: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
13. Climate Action: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
14. Life Below Water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources.
15. Life on Land: Protect, restore, and promote the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, forests, wetlands, and other ecosystems.
16. Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice, and effective institutions.
17. Partnerships for the Goals: Strengthen global partnerships, mobilize resources, and enhance international cooperation.

While these goals sound like things we should all be working toward, as always, the devil is in the details. And one big detail often ignored is that Agenda 2030 is a backdoor way of implementing global communism, eventually leading to neo-feudalism and enforced by totalitarianism. There's a reason the World Economic Forum used to say "you'll own nothing and be happy". You'll own nothing because the wealthy elites will steal everything and then allow you to rent it back from them. And you'll be happy thanks to mind-numbing entertainment, endless propaganda, and regular doses of sedatives and other brain-damaging drugs forced upon you in the name of "public health". 

"The ultimate goal is to remove our individual freedoms, destroy our inalienable rights and enslave us all.  It is “collectivism on an international scale”. --  David Skripac

But don't take my word for it. Here are a few links to help you understand the dangers of Agenda 2030:

United Nations official website for Agenda 2030

Whitney Webb: Sustainable Slavery

The 2030 Agenda: The Totalitarian Trojan Horse

Agenda 2030: A Power-Mad Document

The John Birch Society: Stop Agenda 2030

Rosa Koire: Democrats Against Agenda 21 

Book: Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21 by Rosa Koire

The United Nations Agenda For World Domination 

17 Goals Toward Enslavement: Exposing The Real Agendas Behind The 2030 Agenda

Spanish Bishop: Behind Agenda 2030 lies an attempt to change civilization

What you need to know about Agenda 2030 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

We are moving toward a Global Empire and enslavement of humanity in a digital gulag

Jab the world: Immunization Agenda 2030

Video link: Understanding Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 (3 mins, 32 secs)

Video below: UN Agenda 2030: If you control the food, you control the people.

Agenda 2030: the great slavery

Which Candidate Will Shrink The Federal Government? Let's Take A Look.

As a lifelong libertarian, I've always felt that the biggest obstacle to a free and prosperous society is an oppressive and parasitic government. In the United States we have a federal government that began with good intentions more than 200 years ago, but has since become a hostile, angry monster that can never be fed enough. The size of the government is staggering: as of 2022, "the federal government employs nearly 9.1 million workers, comprising nearly 6 percent of total employment in the United States. The figure includes nearly 2.1 million federal employees, 4.1 million contract employees, 1.2 million grant employees, 1.3 million active duty military personnel, and more than 500,000 postal service employees." [source: The Hill] There are more federal employees than the total population of Austria. The federal budget for 2024 is $6.9 trillion, and that number is expected to grow no matter who is elected president in November. The national debt is currently more than $35 trillion [source: Statista] and that number rises by another trillion dollars every 100 days. The federal debt to GDP ratio is now at 122%, meaning we're broke.

The United States is a bankrupt nation that functions on debt and the intimidation of the world through our military. This is an unsustainable situation, and an economic crash is inevitable unless drastic action is taken to reign in the spending. Painful decisions will have to be made to ensure the long-term security of the nation. But politicians don't like to make decisions that cause pain. They'd rather kick the proverbial can down the road and hope someone else comes up with a real solution, after they've left office.

And beyond the financial woes, our monstrous government is a burden on society, imposing oppressive laws, rules, regulations, and red tape that cripple our ability to get anything useful done. Picture Star Wars' 'Jabba the Hut' sitting on a throne and eating everything in sight and you'll have a good idea of what our government has become.

It's critical that we reign in this obese monster before it destroys and consumes everything it can reach. But will anyone do it? Does anyone have the courage? I decided to take a look at the campaign platforms of the top four candidates and see if any of them are taking the situation seriously with plans to shrink the government. 

Kamala Harris

Kamala Harris (and the establishment players she represents), offers little hope or change in the size of the federal government. She is the face of the deep state, the entrenched bureaucrats who remain in power for decades and run the nation un-Constitutionally via policies and regulations. Harris is the vice-president because of the deep state, so you can bet she won't do anything to upset them. One of the first items in her platform says she will "make affordable health care a right, not a privilege by expanding and strengthening the Affordable Care Act" (socialism). She claims she will "make millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share in taxes", although she doesn't say what a "fair share" is. She brags about the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the CHIPS and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the American Rescue Plan, all of which combined added trillions to the national debt. 

Unfortunately for us, Harris' platform contains very little other than references to things she did in the past. On issue after issue, her website talks about what she did as a prosecutor in California or as a member of Congress. There are no specific plans listed for what she will do in the future, except vague statements such as promising to work on the (alleged) climate crisis, or saying she'll end the fentanyl crisis by "signing the bipartisan border bill that will fund detection technology to intercept even more illicit drugs". 

So we're left wondering what she'll actually do. But we know her ideology is rooted in Marxism, so it's a fair guess to say a Harris presidency will be one of taxing, spending, unfettered government growth, and more intrusions into our lives.

Jill Stein

Jill Stein of the Green Party, starts out with drastic cuts to our military (50-75%). I applaud her desire to close military bases overseas, disband NATO, and stop military funding of Israel and Ukraine. But she then pledges those funds as a "peace dividend" to a number of spending plans, such as the bogus "climate change" agenda and "universal access to basic human needs for food, clean water and sanitation, education, and health care for every human being on Earth". Stein is promising to build 15 million green, union-built, publicly-owned homes, expand HUD and US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Programs for first-time home buyers, guarantee lifelong free public education for all institutions of learning, including trade schools and Pre-K through college and graduate school, and guarantee free childcare. 

In other words, Jill Stein loves a big government, as long as that government is administering far-left social programs instead of wars. Her platform doesn't mention the federal budget or the national debt at all, except to recommend that we "tax the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations heavily". Unfortunately for Stein, even if the government stole every penny of every wealthy person in the country, it still wouldn't make a dent in the $35 trillion debt. 

Cornel West

Our next Marxist candidate is Cornel West. His platform repeats the word "justice" 17 times just in the category list alone. This should give you some idea of where a West presidency would end up. His platform mentions universal basic income, an expansion of parental leave & disability benefits, "fostering businesses that embody the principles of collective ownership" (communism), a "vow to significantly amplify funding for maternal health initiatives tailored to the needs of Black women (racism), free tuition for higher education, "climate reparations to recognize the deep injustices of climate change" (fake science), on top of a number of other so-called "green" initiatives that you and I will have to pay for. Like Stein, West proposes cuts to the military, including "disbanding NATO" and closing overseas bases. But then he says we need to cancel the debts of developing nations, despite the U.S. itself being bankrupt. It's hard to make the math work on his Marxist vision for America.

Cornel West loves a big government that taxes heavily, spends freely, and imposes itself upon us at every turn. That's not much different than what we already have. The only real difference is what the money gets spent on.

Donald Trump

As the MAGA Republican candidate, we should expect Donald Trump to be the candidate most likely to tame the savage beast that is our government. But what does he have to say about it?

He says he wants to "stop outsourcing and turn the United States into a manufacturing superpower". Reducing imports and increasing exports would certainly help our situation, but Trump offers no details on how he will actually do this. Will it involve more government spending or the creation of a new trade agency? He doesn't say. Unfortunately he does say he will increase military spending, including by building a "great iron dome missile defense shield over our entire country". Such a system, which has proven to be a failure in Israel, will cost us billions of dollars...possibly trillions, and isn't needed since we have no enemies with intercontinental missiles who are foolish enough to start World War 3. An iron dome is nothing but a hand-out to the military industrial complex, the same people who have helped to bankrupt our nation and have kept wars going throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. 

Trump also says he will "rebuild our cities", but again doesn't say how he'll do it. Is this another spending program? It sure looks like it to me.

I wish I could tell you more, but Trump's platform is completely lacking in details. It's a collection of grand words and concepts. But I can tell you there's nothing in it that mentions shrinking the government, cutting spending, or reducing the debt.

If you dig a little deeper, you can find the Republican Party's platform which is different in some ways than what you'll find on Trump's campaign website. There, you will see the Republican's promise to "rein in wasteful federal spending: Republicans will immediately stabilize the economy by slashing wasteful government spending and promoting economic growth." How will it be slashed? They don't say. They also promise to "cut costly and burdensome regulations: Republicans will reinstate President Trump's deregulation policies, which saved Americans $11,000 per household, and end Democrats’ regulatory onslaught that disproportionately harms low and middle-income households." That one statement alone is the most encouraging thing I've seen on any of the platforms. But I question why it's on the Republican Party's platform but not on Trump's website.

Another positive note on the Republican's platform is this: "Republicans will end Democrats’ unlawful and un-American crypto crackdown and oppose the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency. We will defend the right to mine Bitcoin, and ensure every American has the right to self-custody of their digital assets, and transact free from government surveillance and control." That's a huge statement, and I hope the Republicans have the guts to follow through. 

While there isn't much in either Trump's or the RNC's platforms that suggest they'll cut spending, (and Trump's platform has the wasteful "Iron Dome" boondoggle) their agendas do appear to have the goal of stimulating the economy, reducing the trade deficit, ending at least some of the government's burdensome regulations, and protecting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. None of the other three candidates are proposing anything similar.

My reservation with Donald Trump and the Republican Party is we've had a lot of promises in the past and an equal amount of disappointments. We don't need four more years of excuses. We need results. And we need results that will last beyond the next election season. 

And it's important to note that none of the candidates have said anything in their campaign platforms about reversing Joe Biden's massive funding increase to the IRS that would enable up to 80,000 new agents to be hired. None of the candidates mention eliminating or greatly downsizing any of the "three letter agencies" such as the CIA, the FBI, the CDC, or the FDA, that have done so much harm to the American people in the past several years. They won't even touch easy targets such as cutting funding to Planned Parenthood or NPR.

But after reading the campaign platforms, I can say without any doubt that the only candidate who has a chance of controlling the "hostile, angry monster that can never be fed enough" is Trump. The other three candidates don't even pretend to care about the problem.

Vote accordingly.

Are You A Conspiracy Theorist?

Lee Harvey Oswald

Do you believe a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, shot and killed President John F. Kennedy? Are you ignoring the evidence that the CIA and other other U.S. government operatives were involved in the assassination and that Oswald was likely set up to take the blame?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

apollo moon lander

Do you believe the United States sent men to the moon way back in 1969 using technology less sophisticated than your cell phone, in a moon lander made of spindly rods, gold foil, and what appears to be cardboard?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

Richard Nixon moon phone

Do you believe that President Richard Nixon talked to the astronauts on the moon using a landline telephone with virtually no time delay in the conversation despite the (alleged) distance, crude technology, and satellite latency?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

world trade center 9/11

Do you believe a man in a cave in Afghanistan orchestrated a massive terror attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 that our intelligence agencies didn't predict and our military was unable to stop?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

chemtrails north carolina

Do you believe the weird streaks in the sky that gradually expand into massive sun-blocking clouds are nothing more than contrails emitted from jet aircraft?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

climate change graphic

Do you ignore thousands of years of climate change and the impact the sun has on our weather and instead believe humans are responsible for a climate disaster that will soon destroy life on Earth?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

CGI image of viruses

Do you believe tiny things called "viruses", which can't be seen in a living state even with an electron microscope, are somehow responsible for a variety of communicable diseases? Do you think these "viruses" spread from person to person making them sick, even though numerous rigorous studies have never successfully proven such a thing happens?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

vaccines

Do you believe vials full of mysterious, often undisclosed ingredients can somehow boost your immunity against diseases caused by viruses? Do you think these mysterious, undisclosed ingredients, called "vaccines", have been thoroughly tested and are safe? And do you believe vaccines were the reason many common diseases of the past have largely disappeared?

You might be a conspiracy theorist.

Scully and Mulder the truth is out there

The truth is out there. But you have to go find it. 

Follow my blog with Bloglovin