Edward Snowden On Privacy.
"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowden
Freedom Wasn't Lost. It Was Taken Before You Could Speak.
You were born sovereign. Then they gave you a name, a number, a flag, and a master to serve. Freedom wasn't lost. It was taken before you could speak.
What Is Fueling The Los Angeles Riots?
Even the UK media can see the Jewish fingerprints all over the LA riots that may soon spread nationwide. From 'The Light Paper UK':
"So just to confirm some of the timeline and key players behind RIOTOUS events unfolding across the USA.
Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor, adopts a hardline approach to deportations.
Claudia Sheinbaum, President of Mexico, sends her full support to demonstrators and calls for more protests.
Protests turn violent and the main organizers behind them are Leah Greenburg and Ezra Levin of the organization 'Indivisible' and 'No Kings'.
Activist Laura Loomer then calls for Alex Carp's Palantir to be brought in utilising their AI programs such as Lavender that has killed thousands of innocent women and children in Gaza.
President of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, begins organizing nationwide protests this weekend with many Antifa elements talking about violent insurrection here.
Seems to be a pattern emerging here."
So let's unpack this:
First, US Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, who is Jewish, sets the stage by saying the United States will adopt a "hardline" approach to deportations, and very soon after I.C.E. raids begin in an effort to evict illegal immigrants. While I support the idea of the raids, the way they're being carried out and then reported in the media creates the impression that harsh police state tactics are being used and that innocent people could be caught up in the arrests. The left is then propagandized by Jewish-owned media sites and Jewish-run political organizations that "Nazi's" and "fascists" are taking over the country and must be resisted. Protests begin in major cities, many of them planned and supported by the above-mentioned political organizations.
Next, according to The Light Paper's post, Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, another Jew, sends moral support to the protesters and fans the flames that turn protests into riots.
Then we learn that nationwide protests are being planned by the "No Kings" movement, organized by Leah Greenburg and Ezra Levin, and yes, you guessed it, they're both Jewish.
As the riots heat up, Jewish political agitator Laura Loomer gets involved, calling on Alex Carp (the Jewish president of Palantir) to use Palantir's artificial intelligence programs to identify illegal immigrants and possibly even the people protesting in the streets. Palantir is the data company that frequently partners with the CIA to gather data and to track and trace U.S. citizens as our government transitions into a technocratic totalitarian police state run primarily by A.I.. Donald Trump is a friend of Alex Carp and is allowing Palantir to create a massive database of citizen data culled from various government agencies.
Then we have Randi Weingarten (yet another Jew) getting involved by her allegedly helping to organize the June 14 protests. Intel chatter says that ANTIFA might attempt a "violent insurrection" nationwide on that day.
Adding to this mess is advertising being done by Walmart heir Christy Walton, encouraging people to show up for the June 14 protests, which she is apparently helping to fund through "No Kings".
As Gordon Burling said in this tweet, "Every single bit of chaos is being created on purpose. Every last nonsensical bit of it. The purpose is for when the time comes, you will be begging for order. Their order."
What he's saying is that the protests and the resulting chaos are being engineered as a way for our Zionist-controlled government to bring in their technocratic control mechanisms: surveillance, digital ID's, censorship, and programmable money. And they might use martial law to take us there. Trump will be fully on board with the plan claiming it's necessary to restore law and order. The public will willingly go along in order to feel safe again.
Freedom will be erased in the blink of an eye, using immigration as the villain. And yes, of course we have a problem with illegal immigration, but that problem was created by many of the same politicians who now complain about it. The illegals were encouraged to come here and no real effort was made to stop them, because a crisis had to be created to justify the destruction of our freedom. Politicians from both parties shut their eyes to the open borders and let the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and the Marxist organization "Catholic Charities" organize immigrant caravans from Central America to flood the U.S. with millions of people they knew would destabilize our society but would also create the crisis government leaders wanted.
So here we are, possibly only two days away from cities coast to coast being set on fire by both real and paid protesters set up by American Marxists, Zionists, and technocrats working together to bring us to our knees and make us beg for their pre-planned "solutions" so we can go back to some form of normalcy. But this new normal will be more akin to slavery than anything our Founding Fathers had envisioned for us.
And if the protests fail, don't let your guard down. Tyrants never give up. They'll create a new crisis and push forward once again.
One final note: in this article I has specifically mentioned how most of the instigators in this plot are Jewish. Without a doubt a few readers will use the tired old "you're anti-Semitic" insults to try and silence me, or accuse me of "hate". But I hate no one. I do hate the actions of some people, and I especially hate the actions of people who try to manipulate society to impose tyranny. Right now, many of the people trying to impose tyranny all just happen to be Jewish. Why is that? It isn't hateful to point out facts. We need to be asking questions when our freedom is on the line, even when those questions take us to uncomfortable places.
Parasites Give You Nothing.
"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state lives at the expense of everyone." - Frédéric Bastiat
[graphic by FEE / The Foundation for Economic Freedom]
We Tried To Warn You.
But it's not too late to start.
Never Forget Their Excuses for Lockdowns.
story by John Tamney / image by Alexandra Koch
The worst arguments against the lockdowns inspired by the coronavirus were medical and statistical. To see why, it’s worth remembering that as humans we’ve evolved to protect ourselves from death and disease. The taking of freedom to protect us is always and everywhere excess.
The above statement of the obvious requires mention as free thinkers and free-thinking organizations continue to either ignore how they sat out the lockdowns, or worse, excuse their inaction amid a massive bludgeoning of freedom back in 2020. Let’s start with those trying to excuse their inaction.
The not-infrequently offered excuse is that since most organizations and individuals in the libertarian space either weren’t staffed by medical doctors or weren’t medical doctors themselves, how could they have made credible cases against the lockdowns? Instead, and rather than take a stand, they adopted “wait and see” approaches so that medical verdicts could be rendered. About those verdicts, some libertarian types are now saying that those who were publicly against the lockdowns back in 2020 were correct, but they made their cases obnoxiously and blindly given their lack of medical knowledge. The only response to this kind of dissembling is nonsense, utter nonsense. See this write-up’s introductory paragraph to see why.
Just as the worst arguments against the lockdowns were medical and statistical, the medical and statistical arguments made in favor of lockdowns were, if possible, even worse. As stated above, no one requires force to avoid sickness or death. About this point, more on it in a bit.
For now, it should just be said that even if the medical consensus had been correct, that millions and millions of Americans would die absent being forced out of work and into their homes, then any lockdown orders foisted on us by nail-biting politicians would have read as tame relative to the precautions taken by free people. The more threatening anything is, the more superfluous is any kind of policy reaction to the threat.
The simple, overwhelming truth is that people should never have their individual freedom to protect themselves taken from them, period. End of story.
Applying the previous assertion to organizations like Cato, Students for Liberty, and others that seemingly took a “wait and see” approach to the lockdowns, their stances were wrongheaded. Lest they or readers forget, the organizations mentioned were founded on the notion of individual freedom as the foremost ideal. In which case a “wait and see what the science or medical establishment says” is dangerously wrong.
It is simply because, as Brownstone Institute founder Jeffrey Tucker has pointed out, politicians at the local, state, and national levels did not take a “wait and see” approach. That they didn’t calls into serious question organizations and individuals sitting on their hands. How could they? Since we know government will never wait and see on anything, what an odd excuse or piece of internal reasoning to explain away a lack of action. It implies that freedom should always be the loser in times of uncertainty, or when politicians are feeling particularly hysterical.
At which point it should be said that freedom is easily the best way to turn the unknowns and uncertainty into true knowledge. So, while libertarian groups and individuals who sat out the lockdowns should reflexively defend freedom every time government is in the process of taking it, it’s useful to add that free people crucially produce information.
Which brings us back to the earlier assertion in this write-up that people don’t need to be forced to avoid sickness or death. Some no doubt responded as they read the latter that some people would in fact have lived, worked, and run their businesses without regard to a spreading virus. To which the answer here can only be precisely.
Precisely because free people will respond in all manner of ways (including disdain) to fears driven by unknowns, we need them to be free. Without millions of different responses, or realistically hundreds of millions of different responses in the US, people (including “experts”) will be blinded to the truth about whatever it is that threatens us, or not. Since free people once again produce information, the only answer to uncertainty about what we don’t know is freedom.
It’s just something to keep in mind in the here and now. Four years ago this month, over 40 million Americans lost their jobs, and hundreds of millions around the world found themselves hurtling toward starvation amid a global panic among politicians. Shamefully and tragically, some of the foremost organizations and individuals devoted to liberty sat out the tragedy and seemingly defend their inaction to this day by hiding behind medicine, science, and a lack of information. The excuses and internal justifications are wholly insufficient. Freedom is its own always and everywhere virtue, period.
Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Source: The Brownstone Institute / RealClearMarkets.com
