TimoMalum.com

Revelations: May 26, 2025.

[image: AP]

Compromised sell-out Kristi Noem went to Israel to kiss some ass after the shooting deaths of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington, D.C. (which many say was a false-flag event to bring in more laws governing "anti-semitism"). While in Israel, Noem visited the Western Wall, writing in the visitors' book that "Israel is the chosen people, and the United States stands by you." She also met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later on Sunday night, where Noem expressed "unwavering support for the Prime Minister and the State of Israel." Although American politicians have inexplicably supported Israel for decades (most likely due to blackmail and bribery), the Trump administration has taken it to insane new heights. I'm beginning to think that when Trump was saying "Make America Great Again", he meant he wants it be great for the Zionists who will soon dominate our nation, and he's willing to use censorship and the threat of arrests to make it happen.

After mentioning this on social media, I received a reply from Dave4691:

"Our cosmetically enhanced Secretary of DHS submitting to the Talmudic ritual of “praying” at a stone wall. How do Bible believing Christians not see the absurdness of this? Many believe this is part of a wall from the temple that existed when Jesus walked the earth. Jesus told us after he left the temple that NOT ONE STONE WOULD REMAIN STANDING! Did Jesus lie? Of course not. So what wall is she “praying” to? It is the wall of an old Roman fort….that's what it is.

This is why I worry about our future. The deception is so ingrained in most people they seem to be unable to see the world as it is. It is not that many miles from where she is pretending to honor our Creator, the people who manage this wall are starving children. The silence from churches on this equates to them being complicit."

“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless."
― Dietrich Bonhoeffer 

Will Donald Trump send your children to die for Israel?

[image: AP]

From the Associated Press: "Chanting “Death to Arabs” and singing “May your village burn,” groups of young Israeli Jews made their way through Muslim neighborhoods of Jerusalem’s Old City on Monday during an annual march marking Israel’s conquest of the eastern part of the city."

A group of young Jewish Israelis followed a Palestinian woman through the streets, calling her “charmouta” — Arabic for “whore.”

Israel has become a nation of sociopaths, so far removed from anything divine that it's no surprise many call it "The Synagogue of Satan". Any group of people that willingly commits genocide, laughs at the death of children, and demands even more blood must be seen as a clear and present danger. Israel in not our ally and it never has been. Israel is deceiving us, extorting our politicians and draining our wealth to achieve its own selfish goals. And when we have nothing left to give them except our land, the next thing they'll be chanting is "Death to Americans. May your cities burn."

I was sent this image of a post by writer CJ Hopkins, no fan of Elon Musk. He writes, "You are reading these words on a communications platform owned and controlled by a US government operative and member of the Military Industrial Complex who "filters" the "visibility" of everything you see. It couldn't get any more Orwellian. Enjoy your "freedom".

I can relate to his feelings. After Musk bought Twitter, I had hoped free speech would return to the social media platform that was little more than an echo chamber for the radical left. I opened a new account and began unleashing some truth. I gently, but firmly, pushed back against the misinformation being vomited out by the few leftists who dared to stay as Twitter morphed into "X". I followed the rules. I was polite, but unwavering. And within two months my account was permanently suspended without an explanation. I appealed the decision. Musk's team ignored me. Later I tried to delete my account, but Twitter refused to let me, I'm guessing so they can retain my data for eternity. So yeah, it couldn't be more Orwellian as millions of people cheer the government operative who they imagine is giving them freedom.

A COVID memorial is being planned in Chicago Illinois with an unveiling set for 2026. I'm mentioning it because it's not the kind of memorial we really need. Instead of being a reminder of the multi-billion dollar psychological operation that world governments put us through, the Chicago monument is meant to reinforce the illusion that a virus killed millions of people before we were saved by Donald Trump's "beautiful shot". It's truly unfortunate that the monument won't mention the avoidable deaths caused by Anthony Fauci's hospital protocol of Remdesivir and ventilators, coupled with the banning of proven treatments such as Ivermectin and Budesonide. It's equally unfortunate that the victims of the COVID vaccines, those millions of people who suffered strokes, heart attacks, miscarriages, and cancer, won't be honored at the memorial. Instead, we'll continue to believe the lies we were fed by institutions we thought we could trust, because we really want to trust those institutions and it's just too scary to accept the truth.

Notes From Clown World: February 24, 2025.

Seen at the NAACP's Image Awards, Kamala Harris showed up looking like a villain in a James Bond movie. Dressed top to bottom in an intimidating black suit that would make Ernst Blofeld jealous, Harris accepted a meaningless award for accomplishing nothing, similar to how Barack Obama received a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing more than being elected president back in 2008. When you're a Democrat you don't actually have to accomplish anything to be celebrated. You just have to show up. 

In her speech Harris didn't speak of hope and change but rather warned of "the flames on our horizons, the rising waters in our cities, the shadows gathering over our democracy". I doubt her next gig will be working as a motivational speaker.

Propagandist Joy Reid no longer has a show on MSNBC. Her future at the declining network is uncertain, but at least for now the nation won't be torn apart by Reid's endless anger and baseless accusations that everyone she disagrees with is racist. Reid's skewed interpretations of world events apparently weren't resonating with most viewers anymore. The radical left immediately went to social media and complained that it's racist to fire a racist, as long as the racist is black and preferably female. 

Proving once again that free speech to the left is like kryptonite to Superman, Christine Burns posted on Mastodon that the European Union should shut down X (Twitter), alleging that Elon Musk's social media platform is actively interfering in elections. She provides no proof. In case you've never heard of her, Burns has spent most of her life pushing the LGBT agenda with an emphasis on normalizing all things transgender. Burns was awarded an MBE in 2005 in recognition of her work representing transgender people. MBE is an abbreviation for "Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire". It seems fitting that a nation that jails people for Facebook posts would give an award to a woman who wants to shut down free speech.

Here's Peter Gleick posting on Mastodon, suggesting that the Democratic Party commit treason by appointing "Shadow Cabinet Secretaries" who basically work against the real Cabinet Secretaries to subvert the work of the Trump Administration. If a Republican had suggested such a thing during Biden's time in office, I'm pretty sure the Democrats would have raised the alarm and likely held Congressional hearings on how Republicans are attacking our "democracy". Gleick's post proves once again that Democrats are perfectly okay with breaking the law as long as it advances their agenda. 

And here's Aram Sinnreich claiming to understand the "psychology of MAGA". Sinnreich says that Trump supporters are "scared of everything" and that they're "jealous of your joy". His post shows how out of touch the radical left is with the rest of America. Although I'm not a Republican (I'm unaffiliated), I talk to a lot of Republicans and other conservatives, and I can say without a doubt that they aren't scared of anything. They may disapprove of behaviors that conflict with their moral beliefs, but the disapproval isn't based on fear. And they aren't "jealous of your joy" because I'm not sure anyone on the left has any joy to be jealous of. The left is comprised of the most angry, depressed, and miserable people I've ever seen. Where is their joy? Where is their generosity? (giving away other people's money doesn't count). And where is their optimism? They are the league of doom and gloom. I'm not jealous, and I don't know anyone who is. If anything, I feel pity.

Finally in Clown World, we have this post from billionaire Mark Cuban congratulating millionaire Bernie Sanders for his "mission to fight oligarchy". Remind me, Mark, what is your net worth, and how many homes does Bernie own? And why aren't you mentioning the oversized influence that oligarch George Soros has had on the Democratic Party and Democratic Party elected officials? Once again, the hypocrisy of the left is in full display. And if the photo above is any indication, the party's faithful fans are swallowing the bullshit with happy enthusiasm. Are they naive, brainwashed, or just plain stupid?

Which Candidate Will Shrink The Federal Government? Let's Take A Look.

As a lifelong libertarian, I've always felt that the biggest obstacle to a free and prosperous society is an oppressive and parasitic government. In the United States we have a federal government that began with good intentions more than 200 years ago, but has since become a hostile, angry monster that can never be fed enough. The size of the government is staggering: as of 2022, "the federal government employs nearly 9.1 million workers, comprising nearly 6 percent of total employment in the United States. The figure includes nearly 2.1 million federal employees, 4.1 million contract employees, 1.2 million grant employees, 1.3 million active duty military personnel, and more than 500,000 postal service employees." [source: The Hill] There are more federal employees than the total population of Austria. The federal budget for 2024 is $6.9 trillion, and that number is expected to grow no matter who is elected president in November. The national debt is currently more than $35 trillion [source: Statista] and that number rises by another trillion dollars every 100 days. The federal debt to GDP ratio is now at 122%, meaning we're broke.

The United States is a bankrupt nation that functions on debt and the intimidation of the world through our military. This is an unsustainable situation, and an economic crash is inevitable unless drastic action is taken to reign in the spending. Painful decisions will have to be made to ensure the long-term security of the nation. But politicians don't like to make decisions that cause pain. They'd rather kick the proverbial can down the road and hope someone else comes up with a real solution, after they've left office.

And beyond the financial woes, our monstrous government is a burden on society, imposing oppressive laws, rules, regulations, and red tape that cripple our ability to get anything useful done. Picture Star Wars' 'Jabba the Hut' sitting on a throne and eating everything in sight and you'll have a good idea of what our government has become.

It's critical that we reign in this obese monster before it destroys and consumes everything it can reach. But will anyone do it? Does anyone have the courage? I decided to take a look at the campaign platforms of the top four candidates and see if any of them are taking the situation seriously with plans to shrink the government. 

Kamala Harris (and the establishment players she represents), offers little hope or change in the size of the federal government. She is the face of the deep state, the entrenched bureaucrats who remain in power for decades and run the nation un-Constitutionally via policies and regulations. Harris is the vice-president because of the deep state, so you can bet she won't do anything to upset them. One of the first items in her platform says she will "make affordable health care a right, not a privilege by expanding and strengthening the Affordable Care Act" (socialism). She claims she will "make millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share in taxes", although she doesn't say what a "fair share" is. She brags about the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the CHIPS and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the American Rescue Plan, all of which combined added trillions to the national debt. 

Unfortunately for us, Harris' platform contains very little other than references to things she did in the past. On issue after issue, her website talks about what she did as a prosecutor in California or as a member of Congress. There are no specific plans listed for what she will do in the future, except vague statements such as promising to work on the (alleged) climate crisis, or saying she'll end the fentanyl crisis by "signing the bipartisan border bill that will fund detection technology to intercept even more illicit drugs". 

So we're left wondering what she'll actually do. But we know her ideology is rooted in Marxism, so it's a fair guess to say a Harris presidency will be one of taxing, spending, unfettered government growth, and more intrusions into our lives.

Jill Stein of the Green Party, starts out with drastic cuts to our military (50-75%). I applaud her desire to close military bases overseas, disband NATO, and stop military funding of Israel and Ukraine. But she then pledges those funds as a "peace dividend" to a number of spending plans, such as the bogus "climate change" agenda and "universal access to basic human needs for food, clean water and sanitation, education, and health care for every human being on Earth". Stein is promising to build 15 million green, union-built, publicly-owned homes, expand HUD and US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Programs for first-time home buyers, guarantee lifelong free public education for all institutions of learning, including trade schools and Pre-K through college and graduate school, and guarantee free childcare. 

In other words, Jill Stein loves a big government, as long as that government is administering far-left social programs instead of wars. Her platform doesn't mention the federal budget or the national debt at all, except to recommend that we "tax the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations heavily". Unfortunately for Stein, even if the government stole every penny of every wealthy person in the country, it still wouldn't make a dent in the $35 trillion debt. 

Our next Marxist candidate is Cornel West. His platform repeats the word "justice" 17 times just in the category list alone. This should give you some idea of where a West presidency would end up. His platform mentions universal basic income, an expansion of parental leave & disability benefits, "fostering businesses that embody the principles of collective ownership" (communism), a "vow to significantly amplify funding for maternal health initiatives tailored to the needs of Black women (racism), free tuition for higher education, "climate reparations to recognize the deep injustices of climate change" (fake science), on top of a number of other so-called "green" initiatives that you and I will have to pay for. Like Stein, West proposes cuts to the military, including "disbanding NATO" and closing overseas bases. But then he says we need to cancel the debts of developing nations, despite the U.S. itself being bankrupt. It's hard to make the math work on his Marxist vision for America.

Cornel West loves a big government that taxes heavily, spends freely, and imposes itself upon us at every turn. That's not much different than what we already have. The only real difference is what the money gets spent on.

As the MAGA Republican candidate, we should expect Donald Trump to be the candidate most likely to tame the savage beast that is our government. But what does he have to say about it?

He says he wants to "stop outsourcing and turn the United States into a manufacturing superpower". Reducing imports and increasing exports would certainly help our situation, but Trump offers no details on how he will actually do this. Will it involve more government spending or the creation of a new trade agency? He doesn't say. Unfortunately he does say he will increase military spending, including by building a "great iron dome missile defense shield over our entire country". Such a system, which has proven to be a failure in Israel, will cost us billions of dollars...possibly trillions, and isn't needed since we have no enemies with intercontinental missiles who are foolish enough to start World War 3. An iron dome is nothing but a hand-out to the military industrial complex, the same people who have helped to bankrupt our nation and have kept wars going throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. 

Trump also says he will "rebuild our cities", but again doesn't say how he'll do it. Is this another spending program? It sure looks like it to me.

I wish I could tell you more, but Trump's platform is completely lacking in details. It's a collection of grand words and concepts. But I can tell you there's nothing in it that mentions shrinking the government, cutting spending, or reducing the debt.

If you dig a little deeper, you can find the Republican Party's platform which is different in some ways than what you'll find on Trump's campaign website. There, you will see the Republican's promise to "rein in wasteful federal spending: Republicans will immediately stabilize the economy by slashing wasteful government spending and promoting economic growth." How will it be slashed? They don't say. They also promise to "cut costly and burdensome regulations: Republicans will reinstate President Trump's deregulation policies, which saved Americans $11,000 per household, and end Democrats’ regulatory onslaught that disproportionately harms low and middle-income households." That one statement alone is the most encouraging thing I've seen on any of the platforms. But I question why it's on the Republican Party's platform but not on Trump's website.

Another positive note on the Republican's platform is this: "Republicans will end Democrats’ unlawful and un-American crypto crackdown and oppose the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency. We will defend the right to mine Bitcoin, and ensure every American has the right to self-custody of their digital assets, and transact free from government surveillance and control." That's a huge statement, and I hope the Republicans have the guts to follow through. 

While there isn't much in either Trump's or the RNC's platforms that suggest they'll cut spending, (and Trump's platform has the wasteful "Iron Dome" boondoggle) their agendas do appear to have the goal of stimulating the economy, reducing the trade deficit, ending at least some of the government's burdensome regulations, and protecting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. None of the other three candidates are proposing anything similar.

My reservation with Donald Trump and the Republican Party is we've had a lot of promises in the past and an equal amount of disappointments. We don't need four more years of excuses. We need results. And we need results that will last beyond the next election season. 

And it's important to note that none of the candidates have said anything in their campaign platforms about reversing Joe Biden's massive funding increase to the IRS that would enable up to 80,000 new agents to be hired. None of the candidates mention eliminating or greatly downsizing any of the "three letter agencies" such as the CIA, the FBI, the CDC, or the FDA, that have done so much harm to the American people in the past several years. They won't even touch easy targets such as cutting funding to Planned Parenthood or NPR.

But after reading the campaign platforms, I can say without any doubt that the only candidate who has a chance of controlling the "hostile, angry monster that can never be fed enough" is Trump. The other three candidates don't even pretend to care about the problem.

Vote accordingly.

The Republican Party Has Surrendered To The Zionists.

This week's Republican national convention looked more like Zionist love-in than a meeting of MAGA Americans. At times it looked like Israel was more important than the United States, and to some of our politicians, it is. If past statements by Donald Trump, Nikki Haley, Lindsey Graham, and Mike Johnson weren't enough to convince you that Israel and Jewish Americans are the priority of the Republican Party, the parade of speakers at the convention should have at least caused concern. The party that constantly bangs on about defending our Constitutional rights actually let Shabbos Kestenbaum brag about his work to subvert the 1st Amendment while also demanding "antisemitic" hate speech laws. I would expect such a demand would be met with booing, but the conservative crowd, some wearing cowboy hats, cheered him on. Incredible. What's next? If a rabbi is shot and killed somewhere in America, will the Republicans demand gun control to prevent antisemitic violence? Five years ago I would have thought, "no way". Now, I'm not so sure. After all, we now have millions of Christian conservatives defending Israel's genocide in Gaza, as if the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinian's don't matter because of something they read in the Bible. (Hint: if your god is okay with the murder of children, you might be worshiping the wrong god.)

Seen at the 2024 Republican national convention:

And in case you are living under the delusion that Israel is an innocent victim of terrorism rather than being the instigator of terror around the world, here's a short video of the IDF targeting and striking a Palestinian family with a rocket as they were traveling in an animal-drawn cart along a road in Gaza. It was a senseless act of violence, something Israel takes pride in.

And apparently, so does the Republican Party.

Different Paths...Same Destination.

"When you know the destination, you can see the journey." -- David Icke

The destination planned for all of us is a global totalitarian feudalistic society. The super-wealthy will own everything while the rest of us will own nothing. We'll be allowed to rent meager resources to help us stay alive, but only if our social credit scores are high enough for us to qualify for payment credits to be added to our CDBC accounts. Everything we do will be watched. Words spoken in public will be monitored. Our ability to travel will be restricted. Vaccines and other medical procedures will be forced upon us. Food will be administered by prescription. Work will be mind-numbing and constant. Joy will be an emotion of the past.

All of this will be controlled by a handful of elites who think their bloodline grants them the world. They'll be helped by artificial intelligence, which will micromanage every asset on the planet...every inch of land, every tree, every drop of water, and every person. There will be no revolts; the chemicals in the food, water, and air will keep us dim-witted and docile.

It will be an open-air prison. There will be no escape, not now and not for 1000 years. This prison is being built all around us right now, and some of our fellow humans are actually demanding it to be built, so they can feel safe, or because they think the technology behind it is cool and convenient. They can't see the danger.

It seems there's an unseen force driving us toward our own misery and enslavement, and few politicians are willing to stop it. Even many of our religious leaders are turning a blind eye to the darkness that approaches.

Here in the United States, we have two major candidates running for president. But whether you vote for Donald Trump or Joe Biden, our destination remains unchanged. Only the path changes.

If Trump wins in November, the radical left won't accept the outcome and they'll riot once again, burning cities and terrorizing the public. Trump will likely impose martial law and suspend our rights, saying he has no choice. It's possible he'll even confiscate our guns, and many in the MAGA crowd will go along with it because of their blind trust. When calm is finally restored, our rights won't come back, and neither will our guns. But few will complain because the trauma of the riots will be too great. "Never again", the people will say, as they demand to be kept safe.

If Biden (or successor) wins in November, conservatives will take to the streets but they won't riot. There will be peaceful protests, but nothing will burn. Talks of secession will begin, but before any progress is made, the left will launch false flag attacks on government buildings and officials and blame it on conservatives. Martial law will be imposed and our rights will be taken away. Guns will be confiscated. Mass arrests will be made. Independent media will be shut down. Social media will be purged of any posts deemed to be "anti-government". The left will scream for a revolution, and the right will be frightened into submission.

(Similar extreme measures could also come from either side if "bird flu" is used as the excuse for another fake pandemic.)

Either way, left or right, the nation will fall into an authoritarian police state status, from which it won't emerge. And as it weakens and declines, it will increasingly align with the globalists and their totalitarian feudalistic society.

America, the last piece needed, will be fitted into place. And the open-air prison will be complete.

The Assassination Attempt On Donald Trump: What We Know So Far.

Saturday, July 13, 2024, at 6:15 pm, a shooter attempted to kill former President Donald Trump at an election rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Video of the shooting can be viewed here:

https://bbc.com/news/videos/c3gwngv2e79o

At the time of this writing, details are sketchy and much of what we're hearing may later prove to be untrue. But based on current information, there was one shooter, a 20-ish white male who was allegedly a part of ANTIFA. Some news outlets have identified him as Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, but the FBI was not prepared to identify the shooter, saying he had no identification on him and that DNA testing is to be conducted. If he had no ID, how did the news outlets get his name and address?

There are also witnesses saying they saw the shooter, with a rifle, climbing up the side of a building and onto the roof, with a direct line of sight to the podium where Trump was speaking. The witnesses notified the police, who apparently did nothing, and they also used hand gestures to try and get the Secret Service snipers to look at the roof, but we're told the agents were slow to respond and didn't even bother to warn the agents on the stage so they could clear the area. As a result, Trump was grazed in the ear by one bullet, two spectators were critically injured, and one was killed. There are also reports that Trump was shot in his right side, but a bulletproof vest saved his life. However, most news sites aren't mentioning this at all, so we'll have to wait for confirmation.

Asked at the press conference whether law enforcement did not know the shooter was on the roof until he began firing, Kevin Rojek, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Pittsburgh Field Office, responded that “that is our assessment at this time”

“It is surprising” that the gunman was able to open fire on the stage before the Secret Service killed him, he added.

Witness, pictured above, who tried to notify the Secret Service and the police about the gunman. Video of the interview can be viewed here:

https://bbc.com/news/videos/c51yly4085lo

Some on social media aren't believing law enforcement's claim that they didn't know an assassination attempt was about to happen. Writing on Twitter/X, Spike Cohen said, "My message to Donald Trump: There's not a shot in hell that this shooter got on the roof of that building without SS (Secret Service) seeing him. No way. They're going to keep at this until you're dead."

Mike Davis takes it further, blaming Joe Biden for the attack. Davis says Biden didn't provide Trump with adequate Secret Service protection, and he "inflamed deadly violence against Trump with his malicious rhetoric".

Interestingly, during a private call with donors on July 8, Biden said, “So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.” Was Biden speaking figuratively, or did he send a signal that something had to be done?

The news media has to take a huge amount of blame for today's shooting. They've spent the past several years demonizing Donald Trump and convincing those on the left that Trump is an "existential threat" to America. They've repeatedly made the false claim that he ordered an "insurrection" on January 06, 2021. They tell us that everything Trump says is a lie, while they completely ignore the pathological lying by Joe Biden. The news media has distorted reality to such a degree that many Democrats now passionately hate Trump, but they don't even know why. Is it any wonder that an unhinged, radicalized leftist tried to kill Donald Trump today?

I'll post another update as soon as some of the dust settles and we have new information. Until then, stay safe, and stay active to save our nation. It's being stolen from us right in front of our eyes.

And now, it's getting bloody.