Revolt Against The Modern World.
"The thing worse than rebellion is the thing that causes rebellion." -- Frederick Douglass
The Existential Threat of the Existential Threat.
Image by Gerd Altmann
The Existential Threat of the Existential Threat.
Climate change is an existential threat.
Misinformation is an existential threat.
Inequality is an existential threat.
The next pandemic is an existential threat.
Our democracy is facing an existential threat.
And everyone must be prepared for each of them and prepared to do anything to stop them.
That’s the current line, at least – the line that is driving global society at all levels just up to the edge of sanity and cohesion.
And that’s on purpose, because it’s much easier to push someone over the edge when they are already standing next to it.
Each of these false threats are being intentionally inflicted, becoming comorbidities on an already weakened body politic, making it even more vulnerable to its destruction and its eventual death.
Being told you are going to die is devastating. Being told you and your family are going to die is monumentally awful. Being told everyone is going to die is…numbing. It creates a state of utter helplessness, a state in which you are far more pliant.
Your situational awareness dims, your flight or fight sense slows, and you just stand and stare until someone puts their arm around your shoulders and leads you away.
And those invoking that dread are waiting nearby to do just that – take society by the shoulder, offer it comfort on the form of entertainment, medication, and basic sustenance, and lead it away.
Each of the threats is aimed directly at the first principle of Western society – the primacy of the individual. All the threats, all of the communitarianism being foisted upon the culture – including the claim that it is what group a person is a part of, not the person themselves, that is the most important defining human characteristic – have the same underlying message: the elimination of the idea that society is made up of discrete individuals with personal agency.
And from not acknowledging individual agency to not permitting it at all is a very short step.
That is the actual existential threat of the false existential threats now bouncing around the globe, clattering into people and families and societies and cultures and intentionally causing so much chaos and disruption that just standing in one place is not necessarily an irrational decision.
Of course, none of the current coming catastrophes are existential threats – they aren’t really threats at all but the vanguard of the global socialite socialists statists has made sure the public thinks they are, under penalty of ostracization, job loss, and censorship.
Besides not being actual threats, they cannot even remotely be described as an existential threat. An existential threat is – in part – defined as a threat to the very existence of a thing or a system. It is terminal, global, and transgenerational. It is not transitory, it is not political, it is not determined by the people making the claim: to be an existential threat something must be real and unprecedented and permanent.
But the term – which seems to be important-sounding because it actually is – can be misused by people and groups to heighten the impact of their statement, no matter what it may be, because the actual definition is either not widely known or purposefully ignored by the people using it and the media that reports what they are claiming.
This opens the door to anything being described as such a threat.
There is also the issue of the origin of the term – existential philosophers focused on subjective ideas of thought and emotion and action as they relate to existence while the more concrete “threats” described when the term is used are putatively real and specific. That is an additional misleading element of the use of the term.
In other words, the term is used to apply a thin veneer of intellectual certainty to the threat that it is claiming actually exists.
Despite the protestations of the greenocracy, the real global existential threat is not fossil fuel or proper food or basic human mobility or all of the other aspects of the material economy.
The real threat is from the ethereal economy of government agencies, civil society actors, non-governmental organizations, foundations, and academia, all aided by the information cabal. Together they do, in fact, currently have the power to foist something upon civilization that truly is transgenerational, global, and terminal.
And the never-ending pretense of emergency is a powerful tool in accomplishing that goal:
What happens when that dreaded decision whether to jump right or left in the face of an oncoming car is not a once or twice in a lifetime decision, but a daily question? That constant state of trepidation grinds on people, placing humans into a state of making most if not all decisions from a place of panic instead of reason.
And it is during that constant state of nervous exhaustion – a state manufactured out of whole cloth by its potential beneficiaries – when those who wish to wield power in society strike.
What is being offered is a society in which no one can fail. But a society in which no one can fail is also a society in which no one can succeed, especially to the point where they can threaten the existing power structure.
And it is that threat – which is an existential threat to that spider web of profitable tyranny – that is being targeted by the global fear noise.
The democracy being threatened is “their” democracy, not “our” democracy.
The climate being threatened is their silver sheened scrubbed personal environment – the actual environmental destruction that is occurring is out of sight, the denigrating of the sub-Deltas who inhabit other places, is immaterial.
The information being threatened are the lies being told to prop up the societal transformation.
The equality being threatened is their right to be more equal than others forever.
And the pandemic being threatened is the right to declare a pandemic on a whim, terrifying the public into ceding basic rights in the name of safety.
The means and the ends are interchangeable, creating a Mobius Strip of dehumanization on which every degrading tactic can be hidden – unless you know exactly where they lay, they are visible only out of the side of the eye, an oblique uncertainty, and can be easily dismissed as figments, as conspiracy theories.
It cannot be known exactly what will be touted as the next existential threat.
What is already known is whom it will benefit.
Note – it may seem a bit odd, but then again really not, but it could behoove all of us to take the advice of Hannibal Lecter when considering what the societal serial killers are seeking:
Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License courtesy of The Brownstone Institute.
Human Extinction Crisis: We're Being Poisoned By Our Own Government.
Humanity is under attack: chemtrails, secret scientific experiments on the public, fluoride in the water, toxins in vaccines, chemicals in our food, and endless exposure to EMF radiation are slowly sickening and killing all of us. And the worst part is that our own government is behind almost all of it. They're either creating the harm, or turning a blind eye while corporations and NGO's (non-government organizations) wreak havoc upon our environment. Our soil is now contaminated with aluminum, our water is reducing our IQ's, bee populations are collapsing, chronic disease is at epidemic levels, cancers are on the rise, and autism is destroying the lives of children.
And yet the government shows little to no concern.
To help you understand what's going on, and why, I've assembled some videos and audio interviews from some of the top experts in environmental and health science.
First is an interview with researcher Dane Wigington of GeoengineeringWatch.org on SGT Report.
"Geoengineering Watch's Dane Wigington returns to SGT Report to discuss the single greatest threat to humanity and life on earth, and it's not coming soon, it's already here and it's happening right now. They are spraying us to death, and not just with "chemtrails". New evidence indicates they are waging biological warfare from the skies. This is a red alert update you must share with everyone you know. The very future of humanity depends on the greatest uprising to stop it."[description is from SGT Report]
Stream or download it from PodBean.
The podcast is backed up on my cloud drive if Podbean isn't available. Click the gray arrow below to download the file. Once on the cloud drive page, you can also click the blue musical note to stream directly from there.
The second interview is between researcher and author Elena Freeman and 'Jerm' of the Jerm Warfare podcast.
"Elena Freeland argues that powerful elites manipulate our environment to create a subservient, transhumanist society. Until recently, nobody I know believed geoengineering is real. Well, it is. It’s even acknowledged by the UN and its climate change arm, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Elena is an American writer, teacher, and lecturer who researches controversial topics like geoengineering, electromagnetic weapons, and mind control technologies (like MK-Ultra)." [description is from Jerm Warfare]
Find it on PodBean: Stream / Download
The podcast is backed up on my cloud drive if Podbean isn't available. Click the gray arrow below to download the file. Once on the cloud drive page, you can also click the blue musical note to stream directly from there.
Last up is a video conversation between Dr Jane Ruby and researcher Sasha Latypova.
The U.S. Army Biological Program has been spraying you since 1940! Want to know how the U.S. government and the Department of Defense are able to spray humans day and night? Want to know why parts of the population get sick with flu and other illnesses after the chemtrail skies and strange fogs? It's all discussed in this fascinating video.
Dr. Jane Ruby is an American scientist, medical professional, and commentator who has been uncovering truths about the pandemic psyop and the COVID injections since 2020.
Sasha Latypova is a former pharmaceutical and medical device R&D executive who now spends her time digging through documents to find information the government and Big Pharma don't want you to know.
A final note: when you look up at the sky, this may be the new normal, but it's not really normal at all:
Are Trump's Technocrats Leading Us Into The New World Order?
"What I have is the realization that we’re in WW3, in which the aggressors are our own governments, wherever we live. Once you run that thought experiment, a very large number of dots almost join themselves." -- Dr Mike Yeadon
Read this again: the aggressors are our own governments. We're at war with the people who have taken oaths to protect us, but most people have no idea what's going on. Mike went on to say, the goal is "to impoverish almost everyone, rendering us desperate for an alternative, such as CBDC (and digital ID) as a matter of necessity."
Where you have CBDC, you also have constant surveillance, social credit scores, limited mobility, and vital resources that will be rationed to you however artificial intelligence decides is appropriate.
Virtually the entire world is transitioning into global totalitarianism, where individual rights and needs no longer matter. Creativity will be destroyed. Happiness and joy will be forgotten. The focus will be on productivity and efficiency as decided by A.I.. People who can't contribute to the new system will be excluded from society. Artificial intelligence will make every decision for us. The wealthiest elites will own everything. This is the cold, dark future that's coming very soon. In fact, it's been under construction for decades, and the pace is quickening. And it doesn't matter what country you live in or what political party you support. The destination has been agreed upon by all.
This is World War 3, and it doesn't look like any war we've ever been in before. It's taking place all around us, disguised by empty promises from dishonest leaders. The only way to win this war is to stop believing and obeying those who feed us lies while they work to enslave us.
But isn't Donald Trump going to save us, or at least the American corner of the world? It's not looking good. The proud father of the deadly mRNA COVID vaccines is now proposing a lot more of the same technology, this time enhanced by artificial intelligence, that's already harmed too many people. He's partnering with a team of billionaire technocrats hellbent on creating A.I. systems that will run our lives. These same systems will also likely destroy many lives. I don't doubt that Trump will do a number of things that will make him look like a hero, but we can't ignore the things he does in the background that bring us closer to the same New World Order that he claims to oppose.
In the video below, David Icke says, "Two days in and the agenda I predicted has begun". I urge you to watch it and learn how things aren't really what they seem to be.
United Nations Agenda 2030 Is A Plan For Global Totalitarianism.
Investigate United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
"The most important factor working in the elite’s favor is the massive and widespread public disbelief in their schemes, because the scale is simply unimaginable for the average person to comprehend.
It is indeed hard to believe that a small group of people, disconnected from compassion, empathy, and the rest of humanity, would actively promote war, depopulation, and the destruction of the Earth. But the evidence shows that all of this exists, and is happening right before our eyes.
This is exactly the calculated response that those in power want to achieve: to hide the truth in plain sight, turning it into a joke or science fiction. (Conspiracy theory, disinformation)."
[source: Revellati Online]
The United Nations’ Agenda 2030 (formerly known as Agenda 21), also known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), is a comprehensive plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity. Adopted by all UN member states in 2015, it sets out 17 interconnected goals to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure peace and prosperity for all.
The 17 Sustainable Development Goals:
1. No Poverty: End poverty in all its forms everywhere.
2. Zero Hunger: End hunger, achieve food security, and improve nutrition.
3. Good Health and Well-being: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.
4. Quality Education: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities.
5. Gender Equality: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.
6. Clean Water and Sanitation: Ensure access to water and sanitation for all.
7. Affordable and Clean Energy: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy.
8. Decent Work and Economic Growth: Promote sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.
9. Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation.
10. Reduced Inequalities: Reduce income and social inequalities within and among countries.
11. Sustainable Cities and Communities: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.
12. Responsible Consumption and Production: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
13. Climate Action: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
14. Life Below Water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources.
15. Life on Land: Protect, restore, and promote the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, forests, wetlands, and other ecosystems.
16. Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice, and effective institutions.
17. Partnerships for the Goals: Strengthen global partnerships, mobilize resources, and enhance international cooperation.
While these goals sound like things we should all be working toward, as always, the devil is in the details. And one big detail often ignored is that Agenda 2030 is a backdoor way of implementing global communism, eventually leading to neo-feudalism and enforced by totalitarianism. There's a reason the World Economic Forum used to say "you'll own nothing and be happy". You'll own nothing because the wealthy elites will steal everything and then allow you to rent it back from them. And you'll be happy thanks to mind-numbing entertainment, endless propaganda, and regular doses of sedatives and other brain-damaging drugs forced upon you in the name of "public health".
"The ultimate goal is to remove our individual freedoms, destroy our inalienable rights and enslave us all. It is “collectivism on an international scale”. -- David Skripac
But don't take my word for it. Here are a few links to help you understand the dangers of Agenda 2030:
United Nations official website for Agenda 2030
Whitney Webb: Sustainable Slavery
The 2030 Agenda: The Totalitarian Trojan Horse
Agenda 2030: A Power-Mad Document
The John Birch Society: Stop Agenda 2030
Rosa Koire: Democrats Against Agenda 21
Book: Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21 by Rosa Koire
The United Nations Agenda For World Domination
17 Goals Toward Enslavement: Exposing The Real Agendas Behind The 2030 Agenda
Spanish Bishop: Behind Agenda 2030 lies an attempt to change civilization
What you need to know about Agenda 2030 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
We are moving toward a Global Empire and enslavement of humanity in a digital gulag
Jab the world: Immunization Agenda 2030
Video link: Understanding Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 (3 mins, 32 secs)
Video below: UN Agenda 2030: If you control the food, you control the people.
Censorship Is Fast & Furious On Mastodon.
Pictured above is a screenshot of the message I received from the power-mad moderators on Mastodon.social, one of the largest servers in the Mastodon social media network. Less than two days after I joined, I got my first strike against my account for merely reposting someone else's content. The original post stayed up, but my repost was taken down. The reason given? "Content violates the following community guidelines: Do not share information widely-known to be false and misleading."
Here's the post:
The original post by Lesley Carhart said, "I am not sure that people outside the US who have not had to deal with a similar party leader understand when we say, 'cult', we mean an actual, completely brainwashed cult. Not just racists. Not just people who like strong men or fascism, as exists globally today. An actual cult, where the members are willing to abandon their families and long-time friends, give away their belongings, and even resort to violence. Nothing, no matter how vile or rational, will get through to them except careful deprogramming. We have to contend with that. It can happen to you. Please be careful out there."
At first I thought she had to be talking about the Marxist Democratic Party, since all the things she describes are what I see every day among the brainwashed leftists. But then I saw her hashtags, which all point to "blue" targets. It was then I realized she was talking about Republicans and probably anyone who supports Donald Trump.
I could go point by point and destroy Carhart's post, but my concern isn't so much with her as it is with the moderators at Mastodon. Why was my repost considered a violation of community standards? Was it what Carhart said, or how I replied? My reply to the post said, "Members of a radical leftist cult think YOU'RE in a cult, and must be "deprogrammed".
My reply was true, because that's clearly what Carhart said should happen to Republicans. Is pointing out the truth a violation of community standards, or is the act of criticizing a leftist my real violation? To be clear, Carhart's post originally appeared on Infosec.exchange, another Mastodon server, but was then made visible on Mastodon.social, where my account is. (If you're not familiar with the Mastodon "Fediverse", this probably seems confusing.) It's possible the original post met the standards on Infosec.exchange, but not Mastodon.social, and by reposting it and adding a comment, I brought it to the attention of the Mastodon.social moderators who might have been okay with my comment but not the original post. Unfortunately, I will never know. I appealed the strike, asking how the repost and comment were "widely-known to be false and misleading". Within a few minutes, I got a reply: Appeal Denied. I wasn't given the courtesy of an explanation.
I really wasn't surprised. The same thing happened to me on Twitter/X, only worse: a permanent suspension with no reason given, and no response to my appeal. This seems to be the standard operating procedure for social media sites now that the stench of authoritarianism has begun spreading around the world.
But what makes it so ironic is that the majority of the posts on Mastodon are from Democrats and other Marxists who constantly whine about the dangers of MAGA fascism. Can one of them explain how censorship from the left, often in cooperation with the government and big tech companies, is anything but fascism?
Worse than I've ever seen in my life, people are radically divided by their political ideologies. We all have more common ground than we realize, but the powerful people in the establishment and the media hacks they employ work day and night to drive wedges between us. In many cases, each side believes outright lies about the other, fueled by propaganda and other deliberate efforts to keep us fighting. It's a situation that works very well for the establishment.
Social media promised to bring us together and usher in a new era of communication and understanding. But if power-mad, intolerant moderators abuse their positions and censor things they disagree with, they end up doing harm to society even if they think they're doing something noble.
Mastodon.social has disappointed me in less than two days. They should do better. They HAVE to do better. They, and every other social media site, have a vital responsibility to the public.
They must begin to understand: there is no place for censorship in a free society. But we must begin to understand: many on the left don't want us to be free.
