TimoMalum.com

Revelations: May 26, 2025.

[image: AP]

Compromised sell-out Kristi Noem went to Israel to kiss some ass after the shooting deaths of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington, D.C. (which many say was a false-flag event to bring in more laws governing "anti-semitism"). While in Israel, Noem visited the Western Wall, writing in the visitors' book that "Israel is the chosen people, and the United States stands by you." She also met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later on Sunday night, where Noem expressed "unwavering support for the Prime Minister and the State of Israel." Although American politicians have inexplicably supported Israel for decades (most likely due to blackmail and bribery), the Trump administration has taken it to insane new heights. I'm beginning to think that when Trump was saying "Make America Great Again", he meant he wants it be great for the Zionists who will soon dominate our nation, and he's willing to use censorship and the threat of arrests to make it happen.

After mentioning this on social media, I received a reply from Dave4691:

"Our cosmetically enhanced Secretary of DHS submitting to the Talmudic ritual of “praying” at a stone wall. How do Bible believing Christians not see the absurdness of this? Many believe this is part of a wall from the temple that existed when Jesus walked the earth. Jesus told us after he left the temple that NOT ONE STONE WOULD REMAIN STANDING! Did Jesus lie? Of course not. So what wall is she “praying” to? It is the wall of an old Roman fort….that's what it is.

This is why I worry about our future. The deception is so ingrained in most people they seem to be unable to see the world as it is. It is not that many miles from where she is pretending to honor our Creator, the people who manage this wall are starving children. The silence from churches on this equates to them being complicit."

“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless."
― Dietrich Bonhoeffer 

Will Donald Trump send your children to die for Israel?

[image: AP]

From the Associated Press: "Chanting “Death to Arabs” and singing “May your village burn,” groups of young Israeli Jews made their way through Muslim neighborhoods of Jerusalem’s Old City on Monday during an annual march marking Israel’s conquest of the eastern part of the city."

A group of young Jewish Israelis followed a Palestinian woman through the streets, calling her “charmouta” — Arabic for “whore.”

Israel has become a nation of sociopaths, so far removed from anything divine that it's no surprise many call it "The Synagogue of Satan". Any group of people that willingly commits genocide, laughs at the death of children, and demands even more blood must be seen as a clear and present danger. Israel in not our ally and it never has been. Israel is deceiving us, extorting our politicians and draining our wealth to achieve its own selfish goals. And when we have nothing left to give them except our land, the next thing they'll be chanting is "Death to Americans. May your cities burn."

I was sent this image of a post by writer CJ Hopkins, no fan of Elon Musk. He writes, "You are reading these words on a communications platform owned and controlled by a US government operative and member of the Military Industrial Complex who "filters" the "visibility" of everything you see. It couldn't get any more Orwellian. Enjoy your "freedom".

I can relate to his feelings. After Musk bought Twitter, I had hoped free speech would return to the social media platform that was little more than an echo chamber for the radical left. I opened a new account and began unleashing some truth. I gently, but firmly, pushed back against the misinformation being vomited out by the few leftists who dared to stay as Twitter morphed into "X". I followed the rules. I was polite, but unwavering. And within two months my account was permanently suspended without an explanation. I appealed the decision. Musk's team ignored me. Later I tried to delete my account, but Twitter refused to let me, I'm guessing so they can retain my data for eternity. So yeah, it couldn't be more Orwellian as millions of people cheer the government operative who they imagine is giving them freedom.

A COVID memorial is being planned in Chicago Illinois with an unveiling set for 2026. I'm mentioning it because it's not the kind of memorial we really need. Instead of being a reminder of the multi-billion dollar psychological operation that world governments put us through, the Chicago monument is meant to reinforce the illusion that a virus killed millions of people before we were saved by Donald Trump's "beautiful shot". It's truly unfortunate that the monument won't mention the avoidable deaths caused by Anthony Fauci's hospital protocol of Remdesivir and ventilators, coupled with the banning of proven treatments such as Ivermectin and Budesonide. It's equally unfortunate that the victims of the COVID vaccines, those millions of people who suffered strokes, heart attacks, miscarriages, and cancer, won't be honored at the memorial. Instead, we'll continue to believe the lies we were fed by institutions we thought we could trust, because we really want to trust those institutions and it's just too scary to accept the truth.

Why I No Longer Use Vivaldi Browser.

I was an early adopter of the Vivaldi web browser. I must have been one of the first users in the United States because whenever I would mention it, the usual response was, "I've never heard of it". Fast forward a few years and it's become one of the fastest growing browsers available, and for good reasons: it's full of features, it's privacy-focused (although it's not the most private one out there), it looks good, and it's highly customizable. It has so many features, in fact, that you'll probably never use most of them, and that's one reason I began to lose enthusiasm. I felt  it was becoming too large and complicated, and a few bugs crept in that seemed to take forever to find and fix. But I still liked it, for the most part, especially the "notes" feature and its bookmark system.

So what happened? Why did I dump Vivaldi?

It came down to free speech, or rather, Vivaldi's unwillingness to defend free speech. This isn't specifically a browser issue but is instead an issue with Vivaldi Technologies, the company that makes the browser. A few years ago, they decided to self-host their own instance of Mastodon social media, which they named "Vivaldi Social". (Mastodon is the name of a linked network of independent social media sites where users can see and comment on posts from the other independently-run instances of Mastodon. It's sort of like what you'd have if Facebook, Twitter, and MeWe all decided to adopt similar user interfaces and allowed each other's members to talk to each other without having to join every site. It's a way for small-time operators to be a part of something much bigger.) In 2023 Vivaldi said, "With our server capabilities, plenty of know-how and enthusiasm in the team, it was easy yet challenging to host our own server to accommodate people migrating to Mastodon. With Vivaldi Social, we want to offer ‘the good old days of the Internet’, where the sense of community is a lot stronger with people." They had good intentions, it seems, but things aren't going very well. Censorship is out of control on Vivaldi Social, as it is on most instances of Mastodon.

Over the years Mastodon has gotten a reputation for being an echo chamber for "woke" radical leftists. Although each instance of Mastodon can have its own focus, most of them seem to attract people with the same ideologies, and the moderators make sure anyone with dissenting opinions gets silenced or kicked out. In theory there could be Mastodon instances that welcome libertarians, conservatives, or anarchists, but I haven't found one yet. So far, all that I've used have adopted the same "communitarian" hive-mind agenda, and no speech that strays from that agenda is tolerated.

I had hoped Vivaldi Social would be different, since it comes from a privacy-focused company that's "fighting for a better web".

My hope was short-lived.

Within just a couple of days of joining and posting on Vivaldi Social, I began to get notices from the moderators that my posts were violating their community guidelines, even though I was careful to follow the rules and actually self-censored to a degree to keep from getting kicked out. I didn't post anything I couldn't back up with sources, but I soon found out that my sources didn't matter to the moderators. Yet people with views contrary to mine seemed to be able to post whatever they wanted with no data to support their claims. When I politely challenged those claims and asked for source material, the moderators penalized me for that too. Simply asking questions got me flagged for posting "false or misleading information".

Here are a few examples of the authoritarian insanity I (briefly) dealt with on Vivaldi Social:

My first strike was received on April 21, 2025. Vivaldi Social's moderators claimed I had posted "intentionally false or misleading information", yet the "proof" they provided shows all I did was ask a question. Another user had posted a statement that COVID was still a serious threat that was killing people. She made the claim, so the burden of proof falls on her. I asked for that proof. Vivaldi Social wouldn't allow me to ask that question, so my post was removed. The original post that I challenged stayed up. I appealed. The appeal was rejected. 

Next, I posted a link to an article I had written on this blog. The article, entitled "Protect The Children", featured a graphic of a baby surrounded by vaccine syringes and a statement by Dr Sherri Tenpenny on how parents have a responsibility to do their own research to protect their children. No claims were made by either myself or Dr Tenpenny that vaccines are dangerous. And yet the post was tagged as "intentionally false or misleading information". I got another strike. I appealed. The appeal was rejected. 

Not long after the second strike, I got a third one, once again for asking a question. A user had made a false claim that face masks protect us from diseases, so I challenged the claim. I asked for "credible science to prove your point about masks", adding that I could provide several studies that prove she's wrong. The moderators didn't say how my question violated any policies or community guidelines, but they used it as an excuse to limit my account so that virtually no one could see it anymore. I appealed. The appeal was rejected.

Five days later, I replied to a post that criticized Donald Trump by claiming he was pushing authoritarianism and attacking free speech. I didn't disagree with the claim, but I wanted to know why the person making the post never criticized Joe Biden, who was one of the most authoritarian, pro-censorship presidents in modern history. Once again for asking a question, I got a strike for posting "intentionally or misleading information". I appealed. The appeal was rejected.  At this point I'm wondering what social media is all about if we're not allowed to ask questions and have conversations.

Around this same time I got a comment from a user who couldn't say anything intelligent and instead resorted to cheap insults and vulgar language. I didn't file a complaint, because I thought that would be petty and vindictive. The comment stayed up. And to be fair, the person making the comment was registered on a different Mastodon instance, but it shows you can be vulgar without penalty in the woke world of the radical left.

Finally, on May 18 my account was permanently suspended.  Vivaldi Social's moderators claimed I had posted material that violated their community guidelines on "harassment, dogpiling, or doxxing of other users" and sharing "intentionally false or misleading information". For the first charge, I had replied to another user's post, saying "Mastodon isn't a social media site. It's a thought-control site. Their moderators seek to impose their personal agendas upon the rest of the world." I'm guessing that by now the moderators were watching everything I was posting and looking for excuses to get rid of me, and by now I knew I was on the way out so I really didn't care if I offended them or not. For the second charge, I was once again given a strike for asking a question. I asked, "May I respectfully ask why the left never speaks out about the crimes of Democratic Party politicians? Why was nothing said when Biden tried to impose censorship across social media? Why was nothing said when Obama made it legal for the US government to use propaganda against citizens? I'm really curious." Even though my questions were based on factual events that I could easily prove, the moderators apparently decided that protecting the hive was more important than discussing reality. They kicked me out. I did not appeal, because I knew that it was pointless.

Although I like the Vivaldi browser, I cannot continue to use or support it. It's my firm belief that free speech is the only way to prevent the world from sliding into oppressive totalitarianism. We can't protect our freedom when we're overly concerned with protecting someone's feelings or preserving any delusions they're holding onto that were created by fascist (government/corporate) propaganda. Unfortunately too many people prefer the illusion of safety over their God-given freedom, and companies like Vivaldi seem very willing to go along. By permanently suspending my Vivaldi Social account, Vivaldi Technologies has made the decision to silence me, a decision I endorse if I continue to use their products.

And in case you're wondering, I now use the Floorp browser, a version of Firefox developed by an independent team in Japan. I like it so far, and they haven't tried to impose their social or political views on their users. Not yet, at least.

Revealed: The Many Evils Of Facebook.

In 2014, Facebook publicly admitted to manipulating the news feeds of almost 700,000 users without their knowledge. The goal? To measure whether it was possible to change people's emotional states simply by controlling the type of content that appeared on their screens.

For a week, some users received more negative posts, while others only saw positive messages. The result confirmed what was already suspected: people's moods were affected — and they began to post content with the same emotional charge that they were consuming.

This experiment, conducted in partnership with university researchers, revealed something frightening: social networks have the power to manipulate emotions en masse in a silent, almost invisible way — and all this without the need for violence, just with algorithms.

The question that remains is: if they did this in a "scientific" test, what else has been tested in silence? And how many decisions that we think are ours were actually induced by invisible lines of code?

[graphic & text courtesy of Revellati Online]

============

Related content:

A study entitled, "The Effect Of Deactivating Facebook And Instagram On Users' Emotional State" has just been released by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The study says there "is an active debate over how social media affect users’ psychological well-being. Do social media make people happier, for example by facilitating beneficial social connections? Or do they make people depressed and anxious, for example by reducing face-to-face interactions or increasing unfavorable social comparisons? Some analysts argue that social media have contributed to the alarming recent decline in young people’s mental health." The study concludes, "Our estimates suggest that deactivating Facebook or Instagram improved people’s emotional state."

If being experimented on isn't enough and you aren't worried about Facebook affecting your mental state, here's another reason to break your social media addiction: privacy. A new article has been published on Tuta.com entitled, "All The Data Facebook Collects - And How To Stop This". The article goes into a fair amount of detail on how Facebook tags and tracks your behavior, but here's an overview:

What data does Facebook collect and track?

• All your profile information
• Any actions you've performed on the platform
• How you engage with content
• Your political preferences
• Your device's data
• All your browsing data
• Your current and past locations
• Your purchasing habits online and in stores

Most people have no idea that posting a favorite cookie recipe on Facebook opens them up to this kind of surveillance. It's probably revealed somewhere deep in a user agreement written by a highly paid attorney, but few people read those agreements in their entirety, and companies like Meta (Facebook's corporate name) take full advantage of it.

Unfortunately the only way back to safety is to delete your Facebook account, and most likely the accounts of any other Meta products you use, such as Instagram and WhatsApp. If that's a bridge too far for you, Tuta.com has another guide you might find useful: "How To Make Your Facebook Private: Yes, It Is Possible".

Isn't it time you take back your life from the soulless tech companies that play with your emotions and harvest your personal data for profit?

The Left Isn't Interested In Your Point Of View.

"The left refuses to have discussions with anyone who disagrees with them. They'll shout at you, they'll ban you, they'll burn your property, but they won't have a conversation." - Timo Malum

[Timo Malum has been kicked off of, and banned from, Twitter/X, Facebook, Mastodon, and BlueSky, for nothing more than posting factual data that contradicts radical left talking points. These platforms will delete your account without warning, refuse to consider appeals for reinstatement, and ignore all emails seeking an explanation. To the left, free speech is only for those who push and repeat Marxist and woke ideologies. No one else has the right to speak. And yet they complain about authoritarianism and label anyone who challenges them as "fascist".]

Notes From Clown World: March 24, 2025.

Here's an interesting post from social media site 'Mastodon', home of the worst snowflake leftists in the world. It shows a man holding a sign that reads, "Tax all the churches to pay for universal healthcare. It's what God would have wanted." 

Wow, so much could be said here. But for starters, why does the left support universal healthcare, which reinforces the deadly medical industrial complex including Big Pharma, but rarely mentions healthy living or natural solutions? The left used to be the realm of counterculture hippies living off the land, but they've flipped and now embrace chemicals, unproven science, lab-grown meat, and forced medical procedures. I know liberals who won't eat a vegetable but they line up for every vaccine they can get, thinking it makes them healthy. Maybe if more of them learned how to grow their own food and tried homeopathy instead of submitting to endless medical tests and buying sacks of prescription drugs they wouldn't need universal healthcare. The way of life they endorse only enrichens the very capitalist society they claim to hate.

I can't move on without mentioning the line, "It's what God would have wanted." It's ironic that anyone on the left would claim to speak for God, considering how many of them are atheists. The statement is sacrilegious whether used by an atheist or a person of faith. God can speak for himself, and I doubt he'll do it through memes.

Another post from Mastodon comes from "Evacide" who warns about "rising authoritarianism". This one caught my eye because we just lived through one of the most authoritarian presidential administrations in American history, and people like Evacide stayed totally quiet about it. For four years I watched the left ignore Joe Biden's corruption, lies, and endless efforts to silence free speech. Even when Biden threatened to send the National Guard door to door to pressure people into getting the COVID vaccine, the left said nothing. But their hypocrisy is deafening, and it's why I tune them out when they whine about everything a Republican or other conservative does. The left has no integrity, and thus they have no credibility.

Mastodon can be a lot of fun. You get to see some really crazy stuff that the left actually believes. But the post above from "FeloniousPunk" is a bit worrisome. He/She/They? says "I expect we're about 60 days out from total chaos. Things are going to get truly ugly folks, prepare accordingly." 

What is meant by this? Is He/She/They afraid of what Donald Trump might do next? Or is this a warning that the radical left and their ANTIFA thugs are about to hit the streets with violent protests? Are we going to have another "summer of love" like we did in 2020, when gangs of losers took over city streets and burned businesses? Will highways be shut down by mobs of protesters, many of them hired by Marxist organizations to create chaos? If so, how bad will it get, and how will the police respond this time?

I have no problem with peaceful protests, but if the left tries the same disruptive criminal activity they did in 2020, they need to be quickly stopped, arrested, and prosecuted. Violence is a tactic of Marxism, and it can't be allowed in a civil society.

I saw the poll above on a News Nation website. It asks, "How concerned are you about being in public spaces right now?" The results are interesting. 43% of respondents are "somewhat concerned", and 21% are "very concerned", meaning the majority of us are concerned to some degree about being in public spaces, despite statistics showing that violent crime is declining and is, in most places, much lower than it was thirty years ago. Yet the public lives in fear. I suspect their fear comes from the mind-control news media, which profits by scaring people so that we come back every day to see what new things we need to be scared of. We also see the worst news repeated and amplified on social media sites, and few of us take the time to consider if we're actually safer today than we were before.

The result is that large numbers of us hide in our homes with the blinds closed and the door triple-locked, peering out at the street on phones connected to video doorbells. We're becoming prisoners in our own homes, living in fear of the monsters we imagine might want to hurt us.

Finally for the biggest clown in Clown World, we have Donald Trump complaining about his portrait on display in the Colorado Capitol building. Trump called it “truly the worst” and that it "was purposefully distorted to a level that even I, perhaps, have never seen before”. He then insulted the artist.

We already know Trump is a narcissist, but his whining about the portrait takes it to a whole new level. What a little baby. I think the portrait makes him look better. He should be flattered.

Bluesky Proves The Land Of The Left Is The Land Of The Lost.

It didn't take long. Another social media site run by the radical left has kicked me out. Not long after having my Mastodon accounts deleted without cause, Bluesky has now done the same. To be honest, I'm surprised I lasted as long as I did, but not because I broke any rules. To the contrary, I was polite and civil and did my best to link to sources whenever I posted anything related to health and science issues. But I did post news articles and podcasts that I hoped would open some minds and maybe create a dialog. For my efforts I was called a Nazi and a MAGA cultist, and my sources were all dismissed as being not good enough for the pseudo-intellectuals who read my posts. But I wasn't very active on Bluesky at all, preferring to keep a low profile and gently nudging rather than shoving in an attempt to not be cancelled. How did it work out? Here's the email I received from the "Bluesky Moderation Team":

Bluesky's moderators claim I posted content that promoted "hateful content" or was "disruptive to others". This claim is a lie. I was careful to be respectful of others. I'm not a bully and never have been, but I will stand up for myself if attacked and I will correct misinformation when I see it. But apparently in the land of the left, replying with factual data is perceived as being disruptive. The left has become so obsessed with conformity and obedience that instead of resembling the free-love hippies of the 1960's they're now more like the hive-mind Borg creatures of Star Trek. Independent thought isn't allowed. Be assimilated or be destroyed.

They don't believe in shared truth. They use words as weapons. They rely on you implicitly assuming that they have good intentions and are aiming at shared truth. It's a deception. For Marxists, dialogue is not a way of attaining truth. It is a forum for manipulation.

Although I had low expectations, I did go through the motions of filing an appeal to my account's deletion. Two days later and no one at Bluesky has bothered to reply. And honestly, the only reply I expect to get is "appeal rejected", which is the reply I got from Mastodon and also a year earlier from Elon Musk's Twitter/X.

This is the world we now live in: a world where mentally weak anonymous authoritarians function as social media moderators and censor anything that upsets their frail emotions or is seen as a threat to their demonic Marxist agenda. It isn't possible to have a real conversation with these people. Dissenting opinions are dismissed without thought. Their minds are closed. Their science is settled. Nothing changes until new propaganda is sent to them like a software upgrade.

I gave it my best shot. I tried on three separate social media sites. And now I question if it's possible to co-exist with people who are so mentally shut down, intolerant, and (strangely) arrogant.

Bluesky has proven to me that the land of the left is the land of the lost. But I won't stop talking. I have a voice. It's too bad the people who need to hear it the most will hear nothing but echoes of propaganda and hate coming from the soulless entities that control them.