The News Media Is Hiding The Epstein Scandal From The Public.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

The biggest story of the 21st century is, without a doubt, the scandal surrounding the information found in the Jeffrey Epstein files. Millions of pages of documents have revealed the horrible activities Epstein and some of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world have been involved in. Although much of the information has been redacted by the Trump administration to protect the corporate, political, and entertainment industry elites who have committed these crimes, we've seen enough to know that kidnapping, child trafficking, violent pedophilia, murder, cannibalism, and Satanic rituals have all taken place for many years by elites who think they're above the law and can never be prosecuted. They are evil monsters, appearing legitimate in public but satisfying their sick desires when behind closed doors. And they laugh at us for being unable to stop them.

Even worse, many of these deviants are embedded in governments, some writing laws the rest of us are expected to obey, while others block any investigations that threaten to expose the crimes of the elites.

social media post about elite pedophiles not being arrested

Twitter post saying all of our leaders are pedophiles

In a sane society, we could look to the news media to research scandals such as the Epstein files and then reveal the corruption to the public. The resulting outrage would lead to arrests, trials, and prosecutions...assuming there are any honest and ethical law enforcement officials and judges left in our declining empire.

But the news media has largely ignored this scandal, in large part because they're owned by some of the same people named in the files. Others don't want to report on something that could implicate the powerful people who own the corporations that advertise on their television stations and websites. They'd rather keep the money coming in than help the victims find justice. 

Although the Epstein scandal should be the dominate story everywhere, instead we're being distracted by the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, the mother of TV celebrity Savannah Guthrie. The plight of Nancy Guthrie is tragic, but we must be honest and acknowledge that if it was anyone else than the mother of a celebrity, we probably would never have heard about it. People disappear all the time, and the Guthrie's are no more important than the people who live on your street who would likely have a hard time getting the police to file a report, much less get nationwide attention. But instead of the media telling us who raped kids on Epstein Island, we're told every detail of every bit of evidence uncovered in the search for Guthrie.

I looked at several popular news sites, including a few local ones owned by national media corporations, and counted the number of stories (on the top page) of the Epstein scandal compared to the number that discuss the Nancy Guthrie case. Here's what I found:

Breitbart News: 

Epstein: 1 (in defense of Israel) / Guthrie: 2

WFMY2 News (owned by TEGNA):

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: 2

WGHP Fox8 News (owned by Nexstar Media):

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: 7

WXLV 45 (owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group)

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: 3

UPI News:

Epstein: 1 / Guthrie: 2

Associated Press:

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: 4

SFGate (owned by Hearst Communications):

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: 1

New York Times:

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: the NY Times has entire section devoted to her.

CNN: 

Epstein: 8 / Guthrie: 6

MS Now (formerly MSNBC):

Epstein: 4 / Guthrie: 3

Fox News:

Epstein: 1 (in defense of Israel) / Guthrie: 4 plus "breaking news" across the top of the page.

CBS News:

Epstein: 2 / Guthrie: 9

NBC News: 

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: top of page coverage with live updates

ABC News:

Epstein: 0 / Guthrie: 1

As bad as this is, these are the numbers more than 15 days after Nancy Guthrie was first reported missing. We're pulling more and more incriminating data from the Epstein files yet the news media remains largely silent, with the notable exception of CNN. This is an inexcusable coverup of a scandal that affects numerous aspects of our society: government, banking, real estate, the military industrial complex, Big Pharma, royal families, tech oligarchs, and the wealthiest elites, in addition to an unknown number of victims.

Epstein case is bigger than Watergate, bigger than Iran-Contra and it spans FOUR presidential cycles, billionaires, intelligence, and both parties. If the full truth dropped at once, the system would collapse overnight. -- Thomas Massie

Most of the victims no longer have a voice, their lives destroyed by evil. But those of us who remain and still care about morality and justice must speak up now to hold the monsters accountable.

Because we know the news media won't do it.

Redacted cartoon by Wilcox

Government Is A System Of Crime.

Josiah Warren quote about crimes committed by governments

"That which we call government is but a system of crime extended over an entire nation. Governments commit more crimes upon persons and property and contribute more to their insecurity than all [the] criminals put together." -- Josiah Warren

[meme by Empathic Revolutionary]

The Radical Left Is A Cult Of Conformity.

meme about the conformity practiced by the radical left

[graphic by Revellati Online]

"Leftists are made up of people who don't stand out through merit or error; they just settle for being like everyone else (their peer group). They think what everyone repeats, and far from being bothered by it, feel comforted by not questioning."

Despite their efforts to look different, deep down the radical left craves conformity and practices group-think. Look past the dyed hair, piercings, and tattoos and you'll see insecure, frightened, and damaged souls seeking acceptance and safety as members of a herd.

They are to be pitied until they find the inner strength to function as individuals.

“I think, therefore I am an individual... not a drone in a collective. I think, therefore I am... libertarian” 
―  A.E. Samaan 

Trump Reveals How He Really Feels About Guns.

Donald Trump quote where he says you can't have guns

“You can’t have guns. You can’t walk in with guns." 

(Referring to bringing a legal handgun to a legal protest.)

"I don’t like any shooting. I don’t like it. But I don’t like it when somebody goes into a protest and he’s got a very powerful, fully loaded gun with two magazines loaded up with bullets also. That doesn’t play good either."

(Referring to the death of Alex Pretti, a protester who was killed by ICE agents in Minneapolis.)

“We have to take the guns away from these people that have them and they are bad people that shouldn’t have them. Take the guns first, go through due process second."

(Referring to so-called "red flag" laws that allow law enforcement to confiscate guns from anyone considered to be a threat even when they have no criminal record and no history of mental illness.)

"I’m going to write the bump stock; essentially, write it out. So you won’t have to worry about bump stock. Shortly, that will be gone."

(Referring to Trump's executive order banning bump stocks on rifles. His order was eventually overturned by the Supreme Court.)

As social unrest grows in the United States, sparked by both ICE immigration enforcement and protests by Communist groups wanting a revolution, can we trust Donald Trump to defend our right to protect ourselves?

His own words aren't very reassuring.

Journalistic Deceit: An Example Of Why You Can't Trust The News Media.

I was looking at the website for channel 45 news, a local ABC affiliate in Winston Salem NC, when I saw a story in the "Trending" column headlined "Iranian news outlet reports over 36,000 killed in protests, marking historic bloodshed". I've been following reports on the protests since they began, and the number of deaths from the protests has generally been counted in the low thousands, not tens of thousands. So I read further in the story to learn what ABC 45 knew that others didn't. 

screenshot of ABC 45 article on Iran

The story said "Iranian news site, Iran International, reported on Sunday that over 36,000 people have been killed during the height of the protests that took place earlier this month". There was no explanation of who Iran International is, but at first I assumed it's a news agency within Iran. But if so, why were they reporting ten times more deaths than the Iranian government? I did some digging and found that Iran International is owned by Volant Media, a company based in the United Kingdom. Volant Media doesn't reveal their ownership. But according to Wikipedia, it is "reportedly linked to Saudi Arabia, [and] it (Iran International) is aimed at Iranians and people interested in Iranian news, culture, politics, society and sports. Iran International has been heavily criticized by the Iranian government for actively encouraging Iranians into anti-government protests and riots by spreading fake news and propaganda and has been described as a tool of Mossad by Barak Ravid. During the Mahsa Amini protests on 9 November 2022, the Iranian Minister of Intelligence Ismail Khatib announced that Iran International had been declared a terrorist organization by the Islamic Republic of Iran, accused of inciting riots protesting the government."

"According to Middle East Eye, Iran International is a media platform for the Iranian opposition. The channel is known for raising the profile of Reza Pahlavi, the last heir apparent to the former Iranian throne, by constant coverage and repeatedly interviewing him."

Reza Pahlavi is the eldest son of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the last shah of Iran who eventually became a bribed puppet of the CIA.

It seems apparent that Iran International is essentially a propaganda agency posing as a legitimate news source. And I suspect if its true ownership could be discovered, we'd see funding from America's CIA, the United Kingdom's MI6, and Israel's Mossad.

We should question why ABC 45, owned by Sinclair Broadcasting, would use a source as obviously biased as Iran International. But they aren't alone. Zionist slop-site 'Breitbart' is also quoting them.

screenshot of Breitbart article claiming Iran has killed 36,000 protesters

Yes, the same number of victims is repeated by Breitbart, and the source of that number is Iran International. Initially, Breitbart also reported that Khamenei had fled to a fortified bunker, but they've since removed that part of the story. But another news site still makes the claim: The Times of Israel.

screenshot of a Times of Israel article claiming Ali Khamenei has gone into hiding

They write: "Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has gone into hiding in a Tehran bunker, according to the opposition-affiliated Iran International news site". The news site 'India Today' also made the claim, and also gave credit to Iran International as their source. So in one day we have at least four news sites (and probably hundreds more if you count all the stations owned by Sinclair) that published unverified information portraying the leaders of Iran as horrible murderers.

The point of my post isn't to take sides either for or against Iran. The point is that what at first appears to be a legitimate news article on a local television station's website is in reality a biased story from a sketchy source that seems to have an agenda. And this same source is also being used by other news sites around the world.

The average reader doesn't have the time to find out where their news is coming from. Most find sites they like and then trust they're being told the truth.

But as I've revealed here, when you scratch beneath the surface you often find that what you thought was journalism is actually manipulation.

Best Spiritual & Religious Blogs - OnToplist.com