TimoMalum.com

PCR Tests Are Being Used To Create Endless Pandemics.

In this fascinating interview (26 mins, 15 secs) between Paul Brennan and Dr Mark Bailey, the greatly-flawed and misused PCR tests are discussed. The same tests that helped create the fake COVID pandemic are now being used to generate new fears, such as "m-pox" and "bird flu" outbreaks. Will the public learn the truth in time, or are we facing a future of masks, lockdowns, and endless vaccines whenever health authorities demand it?

From Paul Brennan's site:

"PCR tests can be abused to generate the appearance of an outbreak or pandemic, in light of the current claims of a ‘bird flu’ outbreak in Otago. Is this a massive overreaction? Dr. Mark Bailey, husband of Dr. Sam Bailey and Medical Researcher, joined Paul to discuss the PCR tests and how they measure up for the so-called ‘bird flu crisis'. He revealed how these tests could be manipulated to create the illusion of outbreaks, calling out the sketchy press releases and questionable testing protocols. “If they stop the PCR tests, they'll stop the spread,” Mark stated."

Listen and learn here:

Reality Check Radio

The Bizarre Behavior Of Pill Poppers.

"People will pop pharmaceutical pills with all sorts of known side-effects without a problem, but offer them something natural and they become researchers."

[meme creator: unknown]

Question Everything.

The deep state exists. Conspiracies exist. The government lies. The media lies. There is an agenda, and it involves YOU.

Question everything.

A Look At The Indoctrinated Left.

Those of the leftist persuasion, whether you call them liberals, Democrats, Marxists, socialists, or communists, share common traits: faith in authority, science as a religion, a hive-mind mentality, and an arrogance that makes them think they're smarter than the rest of us even when they're simply repeating false propaganda. I recently spent some time on a couple of Mastodon social media sites (before I was kicked out for posting verifiable, scientifically accurate information), and the posts I saw from the mostly left-leaning crowd were at times sad and at other times comical. Take a look at a few of them:

Here's a post from a user in Colorado who seems to be upset because the company she works for isn't taking COVID seriously anymore. Her profile pic shows her wearing a mask of some sort, and one of the hashtags says #CovidIsNotOver. I feel sad about this post, because "Prainbow" is living in fear of a fake pandemic and a virus that's never been proven to exist. The evidence is overwhelming that the COVID pandemic was a psycho-pandemic -- a behavior modification experiment and wealth transfer on a massive scale that led to millions of people voluntarily taking a bio-weapon disguised as a vaccine, and bankrupting small businesses for the benefit of Wall Street. Four years into it, and most of the people on the left are still clinging to the fake narrative created by a fascist partnership between Big Pharma and world governments. 

Here's a typical post from the left accusing Republicans of "lying through their teeth" throughout the election campaign. I'm not going to argue that Republicans don't lie. But for some reason, Democrats can never accept that their own team lies all the time. I left the Democratic Party a few years ago because of their endless lies and bullying. I doubt a more dishonest or corrupt political party has ever existed, yet the party's faithful voters are blind to it. They can watch Joe Biden say lie after lie in a debate but none of the lies register in their brains. But one thing that's correct in this post is the statement "We've created a post-truth society". Yes, the Democrats have definitely done that. It's a shame they can't accept what they've done.

Below is a super-intelligent reply I received when I posted scientific data from the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) that said increased CO2 has been beneficial to plant life and has caused a "greening" of the planet. Somehow, "Dark Photon Studio" thinks carbon dioxide is pollution.

"Kelly" thinks the worst that's happened during COVID is "we've worn a mask and cleaned the air". She's ignoring the millions of injured and dead from the vaccines, the negative health effects of wearing masks, the years of censorship, the hospital death protocols of remdesivir and ventilators, the bankrupt businesses, the psychologically damaged children, the doctors who lost their licenses for refusing to support Fauci's lies, and the end of the public's trust of the medical system.  

Here's another person afraid of "viruses" and their imaginary potential to create communicable diseases. If you're wondering if anyone will fall for another pandemic psyop, stop wondering. The left will fall for it hook, line, and sinker. (That's a fishing expression, for all you Marxists who never leave your mom's basement.) The rest of us know that when the government tells us "bird flu" is spread by cows and the top symptom is pink eye, we're being lied to...once again.

Mr Herman says Kash Patel "promoted the falsehood that the 2020 election was 'stolen'. Millions of Americans agree with Patel on that issue, thanks to seemingly endless stacks of evidence that have emerged over the past four years. Unfortunately, the biased news media dismissed the evidence with scarcely a glance, and many courts refused to let cases move forward claiming the plaintiffs "lacked standing" (meaning the plaintiffs weren't injured by the fraud). Mr Herman makes no mention of Hillary Clinton, who still whines about the 2016 election, or the Kamala Harris fans who still haven't taken Harris' campaign signs out of their yards. I recently saw a post on Bluesky that claimed the 2024 election had been stolen from Harris. And let's not forget Stacy Abrams of Georgia, who implied for months that she had won the election for Governor in 2020. She just couldn't let it go. 

It's also interesting how Mr Herman put the phrase "deep state" in quotes, implying he doesn't believe such a thing exists. Who do you think has been running the federal government the past four years? It certainly wasn't Joe Biden.

This post from "BigDogBo" calls illegal immigrants "undocumented" for reasons only he can explain. Changing what you call something doesn't change what it is. He says he doesn't care if "undocumented immigrants" are in this country, which seems to be a typical stance of many on the left who pick and choose which laws are legitimate and which can be ignored. For example, vaccine mandates are good, but enforcing immigration laws is bad. That seems to be the way it works in lefty-land. "BigDogBo" then goes on to claim that illegal immigrants (oops, I mean "undocumented") aren't getting welfare. He follows up with some Marxist bullshit that's not worth my time to comment on. ("Hey kids! Socialism never worked before but I promise it will work next time!", says every socialist every time socialism fails once again.)

I can't even make sense of what Andrea Junker is saying about Donald Trump. What is this "terrorist regime" she's talking about? As for nepotism, Joe Biden just pardoned his son Hunter after repeatedly promising he wouldn't. She might be right about the criminality to a degree. I just wish she'd open her eyes to what the Biden crime family has been doing for decades. It makes Trump look like a cub scout. And I don't know what to say about her suggesting Trump is using espionage to destroy the United States. I can only assume she's been watching MSNBC or reading the DailyKOS and confusing them with real journalism.

I hope you enjoyed this peek at how the other side thinks. As daft as some of their comments may seem to mainstream America, rest assured they think THEY'RE the moderates who represent normalcy. No matter how far they drift from the Constitution and the values this republic was built on, they'll never see how radicalized they've become. 

They're sincere in their beliefs. Don't underestimate what they're willing to do to protect them.

Everything You See On TV Is A Scripted Performance.

"Everything you see on TV is a scripted performance with the purpose of shaping your world view to benefit the powerful interests running the show."

Do Wealthy Donors Influence How The Associated Press Reports The News?

The Associated Press is one of the largest news agencies in the world, writing stories that are republished or recited by hundreds of newspapers, magazines, and television news programs. Much of the news coverage you read or watch every day was created by the AP. You may not even realize the story you're reading or watching came from the AP unless you happen to notice the letters "AP" at the top of the column, or you notice that TV news hosts on different stations are saying exactly the same thing on the same day. Since news outlets can't afford to keep large staffs of reporters on their payrolls anymore, they rely on the Associated Press to take up the slack. That shouldn't be a problem if the reporting is accurate and impartial. 

Their website states "We were founded as an independent news cooperative, whose members are U.S. newspapers and broadcasters, steadfast in our mission to inform the world. To this day, AP remains independent, beholden only to the facts."

Does the AP meet that standard? Are they really independent and impartial? Do they accurately report the facts?

I took a look at the AP's website and saw news stories that definitely appeared to be pushing the political elite's agendas. There's an entire page filled with dozens of reports on climate change, but no stories from any of the thousands of scientists who dispute the official narrative that climate change is caused by human activity. If you get your news from the Associated Press, you probably have no idea that there isn't a consensus among scientists on climate change. No alternative viewpoints seem to be allowed. On their health page, there are several articles suggesting you get flu and COVID vaccines, but there's no mention of the potential risks of doing so. I saw no stories about vaccine injuries. There are no stories questioning the pseudoscience of virology. But there IS a story that defends ultraprocessed foods. And the AP's site has an entire section devoted to questionable "fact checking" on subjects including election fraud, Haitians eating pets, and FEMA's hurricane response in North Carolina. Granted, many of their articles seem to be well researched and impartial, but that's to be expected on a site that is essentially controlled opposition: sprinkle some truth onto a pile of propaganda and the public will believe it all.

So I don't buy their claim of being "beholden only to the facts". But who are they beholden to? Perhaps to their many financial supporters:

Let's take a look at some of them. The list is in alphabetical order with one glaring exception: the Gates Foundation is at the top of the list. In late 2023, the Gates Foundation gave the AP $1,829,815. It's probably safe to assume that Bill Gates has a lot of influence at the Associated Press. Gates is notorious for pushing vaccines, the COVID psyop, fake meat, digital ID's, the climate change agenda, and censorship. While the AP may say it is independent, the senior editors are almost certain to keep Gates' interests in mind when deciding which topics to cover and how they're reported. Even if there isn't an official policy to please Gates, it would be career suicide to piss him off. 

Who else funds the Associated Press? For the sake of brevity, I'll only mention the funding sources that have a clear focus on an agenda that could influence the AP's work. Some, such as the Carnegie Corporation of New York, award hundreds of grants every year for a wide range of projects and most of them look reasonably harmless. Others have a much narrower range and thus are more likely to exert influence on the media for favorable coverage of those projects.

For example, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation awards a significant number of grants to environmental issues, particularly climate change and renewable energy.

The Climate and Land Use Alliance "advances land use policies and finance that help countries achieve ambitious climate targets".

The Hearthland Foundation is focused on equity and justice, which are buzzwords of the radical left.

The Hollyhock Foundation has climate change as one of its priorities.

The KR Foundation's primary goal is "to address the root causes of climate change and environmental degradation". They fund projects that promote the elimination of fossil fuels, cars, and the consumption of meat.

The Nathan Cummings Foundation websites states "We believe the dual crises named in our mission (inequality and climate change) cannot be addressed without first addressing their root causes and oppressive manifestations. That’s why we are focused on the long-term and interconnected goal of advancing racial, economic, and environmental justice (REEJ)".

The Outrider Foundation "supports multimedia storytelling about nuclear threats and climate change". Its advisory board includes the infamous Michael E. Mann.

The Patrick J. McGovern Foundation pushes artificial intelligence and other digital technologies to solve "the world’s most pressing challenges, from the COVID-19 pandemic to climate change to health inequities".

Pivotal Philanthropies Foundation refers to Pivotal Ventures, a company founded by Melinda Gates that advances left-leaning ideologies, with diversity being their main focus.

Quadrivium has five main focus areas: democracy, technology & society, scientific understanding, climate change, and ocean health. How connected are they to the Associated Press? Their website brags, "We helped to stand up a climate desk at the Associated Press (AP). AP’s member cooperative business model helps the largest and smallest news organizations reach populations across a wide range of geographies and cultural and economic backgrounds with climate change stories that matter in their communities. Importantly, these stories improve public understanding of the existential threats we face as well as the many solutions available and underway." Quadrivium also helped set up an organization called 'SciLine', which among other things provides vaccine propaganda to news reporters. SciLine fails to mention any adverse reactions (such as death) from vaccines, choosing instead to repeat the standard "safe and effective" talking points of the medical industrial complex.

With the Associated Press accepting so much money from foundations with clear-cut agendas, especially climate change, its difficult to accept that the AP is impartial in its reporting. Reporters and editors are bound to self-censor even if there isn't a written policy to do so. News and research that runs counter to what the foundations pay for likely never sees the light of day.

Public ignorance is the inevitable result.