Disrupting The Status Quo
When compliance and conformity is rewarded and any shred of critical thinking is punished, when the purpose of education has become to teach how to obey orders...you get a society helplessly dependent on authority, desperately magnetized by tyranny, and hopelessly afraid of freedom.
image by Revellati
Não é sobre saúde, é sobre controle! // It's not about health, it's about control!
No one. Not a single one of us regrets NOT taking it. In fact, we become increasingly grateful that we didn't fall for it.
Sasha Latypova is an excellent researcher, and Dr Mike Yeadon is a former executive at Pfizer, so the two combined are a powerful source of factual information, especially on pharmaceutical issues. Mike recently replied to Sasha's substack article about the covid vaccines. I felt like Mike's reply was powerful enough on its own and needs to be seen by more people. I've reposted an image of it below, with a transcript of the key points further down.
"So far there's been too little mention that not only was there no pandemic, no public health emergency, nor a new illness, instead, deliberately mischaracterized existing illnesses, medical murder, a persistent and pan media lying campaign, culminating in mass administration of obviously superfluous, useless, and intentionally harmful injections.
I know little to nothing about how these materials for injection got made, but I know this: after 30+ years working with teams engaged in rational design of new medicinal entities, then evaluating them pre-clinically through toxicology and into early clinical trials: these injections were designed to harm recipients.
No other outcome is built into their designs. Toxicity is always a question of dose, persistence, distribution, clearance, susceptibility, etc. So not everyone was harmed. Those who were harmed were not always harmed immediately, because there were built into them multiple, independent, unnecessary and obvious mechanisms of toxicity.
I make these claims based on training in biochemistry and mechanistic toxicology, respiratory pharmacology, and several decades in biopharmaceutical R&D.
I do claim to have been among the earliest, qualified people to have called out what I expected to happen from mass administrations of these intentionally harmful materials. Unfortunately it's not the end, possibly the end of the beginning, for monsters are going to scare & coerce many more people to roll up their sleeves yet. There's no benign interpretation of the build-out around the world for products of this kind & the capacity to manufacture tens of billions of doses annually." -- Dr Mike Yeadon
"We know they are lying. They know they are lying. They know that we know they are lying. We know that they know that we know they are lying. And still they continue to lie." - Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"If you only knew how much money was spent to brainwash you, you would realize how special you are."
The deep state exists. Conspiracies exist. The government lies. The media lies. There is an agenda, and it involves YOU.
Question everything.
Investigate United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
"The most important factor working in the elite’s favor is the massive and widespread public disbelief in their schemes, because the scale is simply unimaginable for the average person to comprehend.
It is indeed hard to believe that a small group of people, disconnected from compassion, empathy, and the rest of humanity, would actively promote war, depopulation, and the destruction of the Earth. But the evidence shows that all of this exists, and is happening right before our eyes.
This is exactly the calculated response that those in power want to achieve: to hide the truth in plain sight, turning it into a joke or science fiction. (Conspiracy theory, disinformation)."
[source: Revellati Online]
The United Nations’ Agenda 2030 (formerly known as Agenda 21), also known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), is a comprehensive plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity. Adopted by all UN member states in 2015, it sets out 17 interconnected goals to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure peace and prosperity for all.
The 17 Sustainable Development Goals:
1. No Poverty: End poverty in all its forms everywhere.
2. Zero Hunger: End hunger, achieve food security, and improve nutrition.
3. Good Health and Well-being: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.
4. Quality Education: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities.
5. Gender Equality: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.
6. Clean Water and Sanitation: Ensure access to water and sanitation for all.
7. Affordable and Clean Energy: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy.
8. Decent Work and Economic Growth: Promote sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.
9. Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation.
10. Reduced Inequalities: Reduce income and social inequalities within and among countries.
11. Sustainable Cities and Communities: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.
12. Responsible Consumption and Production: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
13. Climate Action: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
14. Life Below Water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources.
15. Life on Land: Protect, restore, and promote the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, forests, wetlands, and other ecosystems.
16. Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice, and effective institutions.
17. Partnerships for the Goals: Strengthen global partnerships, mobilize resources, and enhance international cooperation.
While these goals sound like things we should all be working toward, as always, the devil is in the details. And one big detail often ignored is that Agenda 2030 is a backdoor way of implementing global communism, eventually leading to neo-feudalism and enforced by totalitarianism. There's a reason the World Economic Forum used to say "you'll own nothing and be happy". You'll own nothing because the wealthy elites will steal everything and then allow you to rent it back from them. And you'll be happy thanks to mind-numbing entertainment, endless propaganda, and regular doses of sedatives and other brain-damaging drugs forced upon you in the name of "public health".
"The ultimate goal is to remove our individual freedoms, destroy our inalienable rights and enslave us all. It is “collectivism on an international scale”. -- David Skripac
But don't take my word for it. Here are a few links to help you understand the dangers of Agenda 2030:
United Nations official website for Agenda 2030
Whitney Webb: Sustainable Slavery
The 2030 Agenda: The Totalitarian Trojan Horse
Agenda 2030: A Power-Mad Document
The John Birch Society: Stop Agenda 2030
Rosa Koire: Democrats Against Agenda 21
Book: Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21 by Rosa Koire
The United Nations Agenda For World Domination
17 Goals Toward Enslavement: Exposing The Real Agendas Behind The 2030 Agenda
Spanish Bishop: Behind Agenda 2030 lies an attempt to change civilization
What you need to know about Agenda 2030 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
We are moving toward a Global Empire and enslavement of humanity in a digital gulag
Jab the world: Immunization Agenda 2030
Video link: Understanding Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 (3 mins, 32 secs)
Video below: UN Agenda 2030: If you control the food, you control the people.
A country run by banks will always be in debt. Health care controlled by big pharmaceutical companies will never cure disease. A state run by war will never know peace. A nation run by the media will never know the truth.
[content source: Revellati Online]
Pictured above is a screenshot of the message I received from the power-mad moderators on Mastodon.social, one of the largest servers in the Mastodon social media network. Less than two days after I joined, I got my first strike against my account for merely reposting someone else's content. The original post stayed up, but my repost was taken down. The reason given? "Content violates the following community guidelines: Do not share information widely-known to be false and misleading."
Here's the post:
The original post by Lesley Carhart said, "I am not sure that people outside the US who have not had to deal with a similar party leader understand when we say, 'cult', we mean an actual, completely brainwashed cult. Not just racists. Not just people who like strong men or fascism, as exists globally today. An actual cult, where the members are willing to abandon their families and long-time friends, give away their belongings, and even resort to violence. Nothing, no matter how vile or rational, will get through to them except careful deprogramming. We have to contend with that. It can happen to you. Please be careful out there."
At first I thought she had to be talking about the Marxist Democratic Party, since all the things she describes are what I see every day among the brainwashed leftists. But then I saw her hashtags, which all point to "blue" targets. It was then I realized she was talking about Republicans and probably anyone who supports Donald Trump.
I could go point by point and destroy Carhart's post, but my concern isn't so much with her as it is with the moderators at Mastodon. Why was my repost considered a violation of community standards? Was it what Carhart said, or how I replied? My reply to the post said, "Members of a radical leftist cult think YOU'RE in a cult, and must be "deprogrammed".
My reply was true, because that's clearly what Carhart said should happen to Republicans. Is pointing out the truth a violation of community standards, or is the act of criticizing a leftist my real violation? To be clear, Carhart's post originally appeared on Infosec.exchange, another Mastodon server, but was then made visible on Mastodon.social, where my account is. (If you're not familiar with the Mastodon "Fediverse", this probably seems confusing.) It's possible the original post met the standards on Infosec.exchange, but not Mastodon.social, and by reposting it and adding a comment, I brought it to the attention of the Mastodon.social moderators who might have been okay with my comment but not the original post. Unfortunately, I will never know. I appealed the strike, asking how the repost and comment were "widely-known to be false and misleading". Within a few minutes, I got a reply: Appeal Denied. I wasn't given the courtesy of an explanation.
I really wasn't surprised. The same thing happened to me on Twitter/X, only worse: a permanent suspension with no reason given, and no response to my appeal. This seems to be the standard operating procedure for social media sites now that the stench of authoritarianism has begun spreading around the world.
But what makes it so ironic is that the majority of the posts on Mastodon are from Democrats and other Marxists who constantly whine about the dangers of MAGA fascism. Can one of them explain how censorship from the left, often in cooperation with the government and big tech companies, is anything but fascism?
Worse than I've ever seen in my life, people are radically divided by their political ideologies. We all have more common ground than we realize, but the powerful people in the establishment and the media hacks they employ work day and night to drive wedges between us. In many cases, each side believes outright lies about the other, fueled by propaganda and other deliberate efforts to keep us fighting. It's a situation that works very well for the establishment.
Social media promised to bring us together and usher in a new era of communication and understanding. But if power-mad, intolerant moderators abuse their positions and censor things they disagree with, they end up doing harm to society even if they think they're doing something noble.
Mastodon.social has disappointed me in less than two days. They should do better. They HAVE to do better. They, and every other social media site, have a vital responsibility to the public.
They must begin to understand: there is no place for censorship in a free society. But we must begin to understand: many on the left don't want us to be free.
